nhojpatrick commented on issue #40: CODEC-286 upgrade to commons-lang v3.9
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/40#issuecomment-593922927
> Having a read of this and you can specify the test source and target
separately (see [maven compiler
aherbert commented on issue #40: CODEC-286 upgrade to commons-lang v3.9
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/40#issuecomment-593930290
My question was whether your dual support would work with 1.7 and 11? Is
there any difference with regard to modules between 1.7 and 1.8 since
nhojpatrick commented on issue #40: CODEC-286 upgrade to commons-lang v3.9
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/40#issuecomment-593970755
> In order to KISS it, perhaps we can: - Release on more time on Java 7 -
Update to Java 8 Gary
> […](#)
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at
nhojpatrick commented on issue #40: CODEC-286 upgrade to commons-lang v3.9
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/40#issuecomment-593923722
> I am against the bump to 1.8 for convenience. There should be a good
reason for this.
>
> IIUC you can still include collections
coveralls edited a comment on issue #40: CODEC-286 upgrade to commons-lang v3.9
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/40#issuecomment-593569195
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/29097594)
Coverage remained
garydgregory commented on issue #40: CODEC-286 upgrade to commons-lang v3.9
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/40#issuecomment-593961445
In order to KISS it, perhaps we can:
- Release on more time on Java 7
- Update to Java 8
Gary
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020
aherbert commented on issue #40: CODEC-286 upgrade to commons-lang v3.9
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/40#issuecomment-593937855
See how far you get. I'm happy to roll a final release at 1.7 if the
consensus is to bump to 1.8 moving forward. There is an unreleased
nhojpatrick commented on issue #40: CODEC-286 upgrade to commons-lang v3.9
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/40#issuecomment-593935178
> My question was whether your dual support would work with 1.7 and 11? Is
there any difference with regard to modules between 1.7 and 1.8
aherbert commented on issue #40: CODEC-286 upgrade to commons-lang v3.9
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/40#issuecomment-593919421
Having a read of this and you can specify the test source and target
separately (see [maven compiler
coveralls commented on issue #41: Codec 285 string encoder abstract test test
encode null
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/41#issuecomment-594154264
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/29108609)
Coverage
coveralls commented on issue #42: Codec 285 base32 input stream test test read
null
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/42#issuecomment-594154289
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/29108656)
Coverage
coveralls commented on issue #41: Codec 285 string encoder abstract test test
encode null
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/41#issuecomment-594154263
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/29108630)
Coverage
nhojpatrick commented on issue #41: Codec 285 string encoder abstract test test
encode null
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/41#issuecomment-594157715
If easier I can collapse these into the CODEC-285 PR
nhojpatrick commented on issue #42: Codec 285 base32 input stream test test
read null
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/42#issuecomment-594157692
If easier I can collapse these into the CODEC-285 PR
This is
nhojpatrick opened a new pull request #42: Codec 285 base32 input stream test
test read null
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/42
Follow up for PR https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/39
From experience people write tests that don't check exceptions
coveralls edited a comment on issue #41: Codec 285 string encoder abstract test
test encode null
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/41#issuecomment-594154263
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/29108609)
sgoeschl merged pull request #9: javax.mail:1.6.1 -> jakarta.mail:1.6.4
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-email/pull/9
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
sgoeschl commented on issue #9: javax.mail:1.6.1 -> jakarta.mail:1.6.4
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-email/pull/9#issuecomment-594190758
Had a look at the broken Travis build -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMAIL-190
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1523?focusedWorklogId=397048=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-397048
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on LANG-1523:
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
coveralls edited a comment on issue #496: LANG-1523: Avoid unnecessary
allocation in StringUtils.wrapIfMissing.
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/496#issuecomment-592952175
[![Coverage
simon04 commented on issue #10: Tune logging: assume that info is enabled
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-jcs/pull/10#issuecomment-594188370
I'm happy to revise my PR if there's a realistic change for its approval.
What about my other, less disputable PRs #8 and #9?
Siegfried Goeschl created EMAIL-190:
---
Summary: Travis build fails for JDK 7 & 11
Key: EMAIL-190
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMAIL-190
Project: Commons Email
Issue Type: Task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMAIL-190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17050620#comment-17050620
]
Gary D. Gregory commented on EMAIL-190:
---
I've fixed errors like this in the past in other projects
nhojpatrick opened a new pull request #41: Codec 285 string encoder abstract
test test encode null
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/41
Follow up for PR https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/39
From experience people write tests that don't check exceptions
coveralls commented on issue #94: Deprecated constructors of ZstdOutputStream
fix
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/94#issuecomment-594307605
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/29115028)
Coverage
PeterAlfreadLee opened a new pull request #94: Deprecated constructors of
ZstdOutputStream fix
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/94
The zstd-jni was updated to 1.4.4-7, and some constructors of
ZstdOutputStream were deprecated.
This PR fix them as the comment was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17050755#comment-17050755
]
Peter Alfred Lee commented on COMPRESS-506:
---
I tested with the attached zip and found that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEOMETRY-56?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ASF GitHub Bot updated GEOMETRY-56:
---
Labels: Maven jenkins pull-request-available (was: Maven jenkins)
> Create distribution
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEOMETRY-56?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17050897#comment-17050897
]
Matt Juntunen commented on GEOMETRY-56:
---
PR is in:
darkma773r opened a new pull request #69: GEOMETRY-56: Distribution Archive
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-geometry/pull/69
Creating dist-archive module.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMAIL-190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17050938#comment-17050938
]
Siegfried Goeschl commented on EMAIL-190:
-
Hi Gary, good to know so I will also update the plugins
31 matches
Mail list logo
