[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13899202#comment-13899202
 ] 

Gary Gregory commented on VFS-514:
----------------------------------

The order of @Test method execution is effectively random.

Patch applied, thank you.

{noformat}
commit -m "<action issue="VFS-514" dev="ggregory" type="update" due-to="Bernd 
Eckenfels">..." 
C:/vcs/svn/apache/commons/trunks-proper/vfs/src/changes/changes.xml 
C:/vcs/svn/apache/commons/trunks-proper/vfs/core/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/vfs2/test/PermissionsTests.java
    Sending        
C:/vcs/svn/apache/commons/trunks-proper/vfs/core/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/vfs2/test/PermissionsTests.java
    Sending        
C:/vcs/svn/apache/commons/trunks-proper/vfs/src/changes/changes.xml
    Transmitting file data ...
    Committed revision 1567656.
{noformat}

> [tests] PermissionsTests leaves unclean test directory
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: VFS-514
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-514
>             Project: Commons VFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.0
>         Environment: CentOS x64 Maven 3.1 build Java 7u51
>            Reporter: Bernd Eckenfels
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: test
>             Fix For: 2.1
>
>         Attachments: VFS-514-permission.patch
>
>
> As discussed in VFS-500 the RamProviderTestCase fails with 
> FileNotFoundException in setUp() if it is running after the PermissionTest of 
> LocalProviderTestCase. The attached patch will make sure the test file with 
> the limited permissions will be removed after the test run. It also makes 
> sure to name the file a bit easier to correlate with the test. It also fixes 
> some copy+paste errors in comments. It also moves the test functions together 
> (moves the private helper functions to the end of the file).
> I am not sure why not all tests fail and why the problem occurs more often 
> with VFS-500 applied. Could be a sequence thing?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to