Github user twalthr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/593#issuecomment-125359065
I have rebased the PR and added commits of @aalexandrov that introduce a
CLI option `--classpath`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14643494#comment-14643494
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1789:
---
Github user twalthr commented on the pull r
Piotr Godek created FLINK-2415:
--
Summary: Link nodes in plan to vertices
Key: FLINK-2415
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2415
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
Co
Piotr Godek created FLINK-2414:
--
Summary: Extend job data in job list
Key: FLINK-2414
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2414
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
Compo
Piotr Godek created FLINK-2413:
--
Summary: Provide real vertex data
Key: FLINK-2413
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2413
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
Componen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14643257#comment-14643257
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2200:
---
Github user chiwanpark commented on the pul
Github user chiwanpark commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/885#issuecomment-125319617
When we upgrade version of maven-shade-plugin to 2.4.1, the property in
current project artifactId is interpolated properly. But the property in parent
artifactId is n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14643192#comment-14643192
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2399:
---
GitHub user sachingoel0101 opened a pull re
GitHub user sachingoel0101 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/945
[FLINK-2399] Version checks for Job Manager and Task Manager
[Reopening #944. The travis build failed somehow. ]
Both Job Manager and Task Manager now communicate their respective version
Andra Lungu created FLINK-2412:
--
Summary: Index Out of Bounds Exception
Key: FLINK-2412
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2412
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
Github user chiwanpark commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/885#issuecomment-125271970
There is wrong description in building documentation. Because Scala 2.11
profile activation is determined by property "scala-2.11", Scala 2.10 profile
is activated whe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14643024#comment-14643024
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2200:
---
Github user chiwanpark commented on the pul
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/937#issuecomment-125268029
Definitely.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642994#comment-14642994
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2324:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642972#comment-14642972
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2324:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/937#issuecomment-125266560
We should try to find out what the problem was in the beginning, let's wait
for @StephanEwen. I think @rmetzger is also investigating the issue.
---
If your project is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642967#comment-14642967
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2405:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/936#issuecomment-125265963
Sure, go ahead. :smile:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642943#comment-14642943
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2391:
---
Github user mjsax commented on the pull req
Github user mjsax commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/940#issuecomment-125261373
+1 for merging
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642932#comment-14642932
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2405:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull re
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/936#issuecomment-125259161
Travis apparently passes (there was some unrelated Kafka error), so if no
objections I will merge this tomorrow :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Junghanns updated FLINK-2411:
Description:
Graph summarization determines a structural grouping of similar vertices and
e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Junghanns updated FLINK-2411:
Description:
Graph summarization determines a structural grouping of similar vertices and
e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Junghanns updated FLINK-2411:
Description:
Graph summarization determines a structural grouping of similar vertices and
e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Junghanns updated FLINK-2411:
Description:
Graph summarization determines a structural grouping of similar vertices and
e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Junghanns updated FLINK-2411:
Description:
Graph summarization determines a structural grouping of similar vertices and
e
Martin Junghanns created FLINK-2411:
---
Summary: Add basic graph summarization algorithm
Key: FLINK-2411
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2411
Project: Flink
Issue Type: New F
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642828#comment-14642828
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2399:
---
Github user sachingoel0101 closed the pull
Github user sachingoel0101 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/944
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user vasia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/847#issuecomment-125225039
Hi @shghatge, @andralungu,
I built on the current state of this PR and made the proposed changes
above, together with some styling changes. You can see the result o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642781#comment-14642781
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1520:
---
Github user vasia commented on the pull req
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642743#comment-14642743
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2399:
---
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/944#issuecomment-125216770
Adding these checks however already make sure the older task manager or job
manager will be able to register with the new ones because the message objects
have cha
GitHub user sachingoel0101 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/944
[FLINK-2399] Version checks for Job Manager and Task Manager
Both Job Manager and Task Manager now communicate their respective version
IDs to each other as part of registration messages.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642733#comment-14642733
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2399:
---
GitHub user sachingoel0101 opened a pull re
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/936#issuecomment-125212680
I updated the PR according to the comments, and added an IT case that tests
all 3 functions. (map-localstate, flatmap-localstate, filter-partitionedstate)
Let's se
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642730#comment-14642730
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2405:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642713#comment-14642713
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2410:
---
Github user twalthr commented on the pull r
Github user twalthr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/943#issuecomment-125203795
I have created a separate test. But the idea is good. I will create a Table
API example from my current code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642702#comment-14642702
]
Robert Metzger commented on FLINK-2213:
---
It does not affect the amount of CPU resour
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642683#comment-14642683
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2408:
---
Github user aalexandrov commented on the pu
Github user aalexandrov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/941#issuecomment-125192692
I guess the "s" in the name is the giveaway...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
fangfengbin updated FLINK-2391:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: Thank you very much!)
> Storm-compatibility:method FlinkTopologyBuilder.cr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
fangfengbin updated FLINK-2391:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: Thank you very much!)
> Storm-compatibility:method FlinkTopologyBuilder.cr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642678#comment-14642678
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2391:
---
Github user ffbin commented on the pull req
Github user ffbin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/940#issuecomment-125192161
Thank you very much!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642680#comment-14642680
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2410:
---
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/943#issuecomment-125192186
I would just use the Table API example you've posted in the JIRA and add
another IT case for the Table API
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642676#comment-14642676
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2410:
---
Github user twalthr commented on the pull r
Github user twalthr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/943#issuecomment-125191888
The lines are basically copied from PojoComparator but yes I can add a test
case for it ;)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
fangfengbin updated FLINK-2391:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: Thank you very much!)
> Storm-compatibility:method FlinkTopologyBuilder.cr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642672#comment-14642672
]
fangfengbin commented on FLINK-2391:
Thank you very much!
> Storm-compatibility:metho
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642670#comment-14642670
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2410:
---
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642674#comment-14642674
]
fangfengbin commented on FLINK-2391:
Thank you very much!
> Storm-compatibility:metho
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642673#comment-14642673
]
fangfengbin commented on FLINK-2391:
Thank you very much!
> Storm-compatibility:metho
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642675#comment-14642675
]
fangfengbin commented on FLINK-2391:
Thank you very much!
> Storm-compatibility:metho
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/943#issuecomment-125191411
Thank you for the PR.
Can you add a test case validating the fix?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Git
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642667#comment-14642667
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2410:
---
GitHub user twalthr opened a pull request:
GitHub user twalthr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/943
[FLINK-2410] [java api] PojoTypeInfo is not completely serializable
The type `java.reflect.Field` is not Serializable and has to be serialized
manually, which was not implemented until now in `PojoTy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642665#comment-14642665
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2408:
---
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/941#issuecomment-125191075
sbt can't do that.
We are lucky here because the `maven-shade-plugin` is generating a
dependency-reduced pom with the effective settings.
(Take a look in your
`/
Github user aalexandrov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/941#issuecomment-125189988
If sbt can resolve profile-based dependencies this should be OK.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642662#comment-14642662
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2408:
---
Github user aalexandrov commented on the pu
Timo Walther created FLINK-2410:
---
Summary: PojoTypeInfo is not completely serializable
Key: FLINK-2410
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2410
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642658#comment-14642658
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2404:
---
GitHub user sachingoel0101 opened a pull re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642657#comment-14642657
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2200:
---
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull
GitHub user sachingoel0101 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/942
[FLINK-2404]Primitive add methods to Accumulators
Adds primitive add value methods to Double, Int and Long counter.
Benchmark: Run independently of Flink on the LongCounter accumulator
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/885#issuecomment-125187262
Okay, I tried it again and you are right. It seems to create the artifacts
correctly.
I was confused because
a) the reactor summary didn't contain the variable:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642654#comment-14642654
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2408:
---
Github user chiwanpark commented on the pul
Github user chiwanpark commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/941#issuecomment-125185305
Hi, pom.xml file of flink-scala module has also profile based dependency
setting. Is it okay without modification?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/938#issuecomment-125184157
This is the same issue as in Stephan's build:
https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/72752909
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642644#comment-14642644
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2406:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull re
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/938#issuecomment-125183346
From Gyulas's comment in #937, there seems to be a deadlock. @gyfora, can
you provide more input?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642641#comment-14642641
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2406:
---
Github user uce commented on the pull reque
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642634#comment-14642634
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2408:
---
Github user aalexandrov commented on the pu
Github user aalexandrov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/941#issuecomment-125182364
Then it should be good to merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/941#issuecomment-125181480
I don't think that I'm removing the activation of the `scala-2.11` profile.
If the `scala-2.11` property is set, the default value of the property will
be overwritten
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642631#comment-14642631
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2408:
---
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull
Github user aalexandrov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/941#issuecomment-125180542
Is the removal of the property-based activation (`-Dscala-2.11`) also
intentional? I think this might be used in the travis.yml.
---
If your project is set up for it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642623#comment-14642623
]
Rico Bergmann edited comment on FLINK-2325 at 7/27/15 12:02 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642626#comment-14642626
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2408:
---
Github user aalexandrov commented on the pu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642623#comment-14642623
]
Rico Bergmann commented on FLINK-2325:
--
Just checked it, but it's still the same beha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642622#comment-14642622
]
Maximilian Michels commented on FLINK-2404:
---
Although the performance impact mig
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642620#comment-14642620
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2161:
---
Github user nikste commented on the pull re
Github user nikste commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/805#issuecomment-125179652
The IT case now looks for a jar inside the ml-folder which does not contain
"test" or "original".
Thus the IT case should work for different flink-versions as long as t
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/936#issuecomment-125179431
You actually make a good point. Since one cannot apply multiple
transformations while keeping a KeyedDataStream, we can assume stateByKey true
on a keyedDataStream, otherw
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642619#comment-14642619
]
Maximilian Michels commented on FLINK-2404:
---
I think it makes more sense to benc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642618#comment-14642618
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2405:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642607#comment-14642607
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2391:
---
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/940#issuecomment-125177948
By the way, you don't need to open another pull request for updating it.
Just force-push into the branch this PR is based on (`Feature2`).
---
If your project is set
GitHub user rmetzger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/941
[FLINK-2408] Define all maven properties outside build profiles
See JIRA issue for details.
@aalexandrov, can you take a look at this?
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642600#comment-14642600
]
Sachin Goel edited comment on FLINK-2404 at 7/27/15 11:51 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642606#comment-14642606
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2408:
---
GitHub user rmetzger opened a pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642605#comment-14642605
]
Sachin Goel commented on FLINK-2404:
I'm using jdk8, specifically release 1.8.0_45 on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Till Rohrmann reassigned FLINK-2409:
Assignee: Till Rohrmann
> Old JM web interface is sending cancel messages w/o leader ID
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642600#comment-14642600
]
Sachin Goel edited comment on FLINK-2404 at 7/27/15 11:49 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642602#comment-14642602
]
Maximilian Michels commented on FLINK-2404:
---
The performance impact might differ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642600#comment-14642600
]
Sachin Goel commented on FLINK-2404:
In fact, here are some detailed timings under the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642599#comment-14642599
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2391:
---
Github user mjsax commented on the pull req
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
