[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17636390#comment-17636390
]
nobleyd commented on FLINK-28695:
-
[~pnowojski] Hi, we have the same problem, and adjusting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17635285#comment-17635285
]
nobleyd commented on FLINK-28695:
-
We also encounter this problem in production, and task failures will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-27341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17626171#comment-17626171
]
nobleyd commented on FLINK-27341:
-
Hi, this issue is not resolve in flink1.16, whilte I think it is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-27341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17585171#comment-17585171
]
nobleyd commented on FLINK-27341:
-
Hi, I want to known which release will fix this issue, is there any
nobleyd created FLINK-28577:
---
Summary: 1.15.1 web ui console report error about checkpoint size
Key: FLINK-28577
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28577
Project: Flink
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17441689#comment-17441689
]
nobleyd commented on FLINK-24758:
-
It is better if make it configurable for the user. For example, a new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17402793#comment-17402793
]
nobleyd commented on FLINK-10740:
-
Since the source split output is created in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17311268#comment-17311268
]
nobleyd commented on FLINK-21507:
-
Hi, [~izeigerman]. I don't know what is the original purpose for you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17294328#comment-17294328
]
nobleyd commented on FLINK-11536:
-
[~yunta] Hi. I also met this problem, but my taskmanager is not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17291418#comment-17291418
]
nobleyd commented on FLINK-21507:
-
{quote}I see that only last partitioning operation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17169765#comment-17169765
]
nobleyd commented on FLINK-18799:
-
[~zhuzh] Maybe some detail is not clear and make you confused. I do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nobleyd updated FLINK-18799:
Description:
I have a completed job, and each vertex may have different parallelism, and
what troubles
nobleyd created FLINK-18799:
---
Summary: improve slot allocation to make resource balance among
machines.
Key: FLINK-18799
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18799
Project: Flink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nobleyd closed FLINK-17479.
---
Release Note: JDK issue
Resolution: Fixed
> Occasional checkpoint failure due to null pointer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17108317#comment-17108317
]
nobleyd commented on FLINK-17493:
-
[~xintongsong] Yes, it comes to direct memory OOM.
> Possible direct
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17107341#comment-17107341
]
nobleyd commented on FLINK-17487:
-
[~rmetzger] No, if I cancel the job, the checkpoints will be retained
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17107331#comment-17107331
]
nobleyd commented on FLINK-17493:
-
[~xintongsong], I readjusted the affected version, which was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nobleyd updated FLINK-17493:
Attachment: image-2020-05-14-21-58-59-152.png
> Possible direct memory leak in cassandra sink
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nobleyd updated FLINK-17493:
Affects Version/s: (was: 1.9.3)
1.9.0
> Possible direct memory leak in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17103613#comment-17103613
]
nobleyd commented on FLINK-17487:
-
I think the only two case that the checkpoints should be deleted is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17103612#comment-17103612
]
nobleyd commented on FLINK-17487:
-
Someone may say if I need to restart the job using an older
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17103610#comment-17103610
]
nobleyd commented on FLINK-17479:
-
[~klion26]
In fact, this is exactly what I feel strange. I don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nobleyd updated FLINK-17479:
Comment: was deleted
(was: [~klion26]
In fact, this is exactly what I feel strange. I don't know the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17103607#comment-17103607
]
nobleyd commented on FLINK-17479:
-
[~klion26]
In fact, this is exactly what I feel strange. I don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nobleyd closed FLINK-17492.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
> Possible direct memory leak in cassandra sink
>
nobleyd created FLINK-17494:
---
Summary: Possible direct memory leak in cassandra sink
Key: FLINK-17494
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17494
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
nobleyd created FLINK-17493:
---
Summary: Possible direct memory leak in cassandra sink
Key: FLINK-17493
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17493
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
nobleyd created FLINK-17492:
---
Summary: Possible direct memory leak in cassandra sink
Key: FLINK-17492
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17492
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
nobleyd created FLINK-17487:
---
Summary: Do not delete old checkpoints when stop the job.
Key: FLINK-17487
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17487
Project: Flink
Issue Type:
nobleyd created FLINK-17479:
---
Summary: Occasional checkpoint failure due to null pointer
exception in Flink version 1.10
Key: FLINK-17479
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17479
Project:
30 matches
Mail list logo