akalash commented on pull request #17440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/17440#issuecomment-946787559
@dawidwys, thanks for the idea. I have checked it and it looks like it
should work without any problem and this implementation looks more correct than
current one. So let's
akalash commented on pull request #17440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/17440#issuecomment-945739757
@dawidwys, I will try to implement it this way.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
akalash commented on pull request #17440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/17440#issuecomment-943469088
I don't really sure about this proposal because we already create the client
via clientBuilder, and then, by some reason, we need to wait on a future before
the call of the one
akalash commented on pull request #17440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/17440#issuecomment-940200558
> Do we really just stop debloating or do we trigger a failover?
As I can see we just stopping debloating and no failover would be triggered
> Shouldn't the
