slinkydeveloper commented on pull request #17520:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/17520#issuecomment-970125850
Just did another pass, from table point of view this is good to go for me
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
slinkydeveloper commented on pull request #17520:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/17520#issuecomment-948377409
@tsreaper I start getting your point of lazyness, but now I wonder, why is
Avro different from, for example parquet? In parquet format, I see that when
you invoke
slinkydeveloper commented on pull request #17520:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/17520#issuecomment-947418884
> The biggest concern is that StreamFormatAdapter.Reader#readBatch stores
all results in a batch in heap memory. This is bad because avro is a format
which supports
