Github user greghogan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1517
CI tests are passing. I've been testing Gelly algorithms with this without
error. I will merge this ...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user ggevay commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1517
> Reading back through the discussion I see that there are many ideas for
future performance enhancements. If not already suggested I'd like to consider
skipping staging for fixed length records.
Github user greghogan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1517
+1 with just a few superficial comments.
Reading back through the discussion I see that there are many ideas for
future performance enhancements. If not already suggested I'd like to
Github user aalexandrov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1517
@ggevay :+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user ggevay commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1517
I have rebased to the current master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user ggevay commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1517
Hi @fhueske,
Thanks for the comments, I think I have addressed all of them.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
