[GitHub] flink issue #2065: [FLINK-4011] Keep UserCodeClassLoader in archived Executi...

2016-06-07 Thread rmetzger
Github user rmetzger commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2065 Thank you for the review. I'll merge it --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] flink issue #2065: [FLINK-4011] Keep UserCodeClassLoader in archived Executi...

2016-06-07 Thread StephanEwen
Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2065 Given the current status, this is a good pragmatic fif. +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] flink issue #2065: [FLINK-4011] Keep UserCodeClassLoader in archived Executi...

2016-06-05 Thread StephanEwen
Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2065 You already outlined one of the drawbacks (holding on to the classes). There are probably other parts in the execution graph that currently hold onto user defined classes as well. A