[GitHub] flink issue #2108: [FLINK-4027] Flush FlinkKafkaProducer on checkpoints

2016-06-30 Thread tillrohrmann
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2108 Changes look good to me @rmetzger :-) I had only some minor comments. +1 for merging after addressing the comments. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have

[GitHub] flink issue #2108: [FLINK-4027] Flush FlinkKafkaProducer on checkpoints

2016-06-30 Thread rmetzger
Github user rmetzger commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2108 Thank you for your review @tillrohrmann and @zentol . I tried addressing all your concerns. Please let me know what you think about it. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to

[GitHub] flink issue #2108: [FLINK-4027] Flush FlinkKafkaProducer on checkpoints

2016-06-22 Thread tillrohrmann
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2108 Good work @rmetzger. Well documented code and a good idea to solve the problem. I had some comments concerning concurrent accesses to `pendingRecords` and test stability on Travis. Once we've

[GitHub] flink issue #2108: [FLINK-4027] Flush FlinkKafkaProducer on checkpoints

2016-06-16 Thread eliaslevy
Github user eliaslevy commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2108 👍 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] flink issue #2108: [FLINK-4027] Flush FlinkKafkaProducer on checkpoints

2016-06-16 Thread rmetzger
Github user rmetzger commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2108 Thank you for the review @eliaslevy! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature