Github user greghogan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2617
@StephanEwen, no worries about deferring this. Performance is nice but
scaling and stability certainly takes precedence. Just wanted to make sure
there was ample time between review and release.
Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2617
@greghogan I am quite deep into some large scale deployment and scalability
issues right now. I plan to write a mail to the mailing list on that, actually.
If possible, I'd like to defer
Github user greghogan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2617
Hi @StephanEwen, should we endeavor to get this into 1.2 or defer to the
next release?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2617
I have started like to take a look at this...
The `FixLegthRecordSorter` and its interactions with the serializers /
comparators was not very well tested before, hence not activated. I
