[GitHub] flink issue #2992: [FLINK-5325] Splitting user/system-facing API of Closeabl...

2017-08-15 Thread StefanRRichter
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2992 I will drop this PR. I think the rebase is worse than a redo in case we want this at some point. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear

[GitHub] flink issue #2992: [FLINK-5325] Splitting user/system-facing API of Closeabl...

2017-08-06 Thread zentol
Github user zentol commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2992 What's the status of this PR @StefanRRichter ? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] flink issue #2992: [FLINK-5325] Splitting user/system-facing API of Closeabl...

2017-01-31 Thread StefanRRichter
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2992 I will do another pass over it first an then rebase. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] flink issue #2992: [FLINK-5325] Splitting user/system-facing API of Closeabl...

2017-01-31 Thread aljoscha
Github user aljoscha commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2992 @StefanRRichter If you also agree, could you please rebase on the latest master? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If

[GitHub] flink issue #2992: [FLINK-5325] Splitting user/system-facing API of Closeabl...

2017-01-31 Thread tillrohrmann
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2992 +1 for merging. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so,

[GitHub] flink issue #2992: [FLINK-5325] Splitting user/system-facing API of Closeabl...

2016-12-13 Thread StefanRRichter
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2992 I made the interface generic and changed the hierarchy as suggested by @zentol. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

[GitHub] flink issue #2992: [FLINK-5325] Splitting user/system-facing API of Closeabl...

2016-12-13 Thread tillrohrmann
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2992 Changes look good to me. But I think that @zentol is right that `AbstractCloseableRegistry` should probably implement the `CloseableRegistry` interface from an OOP point of view. --- If your

[GitHub] flink issue #2992: [FLINK-5325] Splitting user/system-facing API of Closeabl...

2016-12-13 Thread StefanRRichter
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2992 CC @tillrohrmann @aljoscha --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled