Github user NicoK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4374
but honestly, the previous approach just looks wrong: adding it and in case
of a conflict reverting that `put` operation.
What if (and I'm walking in the dark here) something already operates on
Github user greghogan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4374
@RebornHuan although this change looks to be correct and makes good use of
the newer API, there is a trade-off between deleting a line of code called
during an error condition and the risk of such
Github user greghogan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4374
@RebornHuan please provide a brief description of the purpose of this
change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user NicoK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4374
Although this totally makes sense and would be nice to change, we cannot
merge it until Java 7 has been dropped (as you see from the TravisCI runs).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
