Github user yanghua commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5869
@zentol please see new PR #6060 , closing this PR...
---
Github user zentol commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5869
that should do the trick imo.
---
Github user yanghua commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5869
so I just remove the close method from `disassociateFromJobManager `?
---
Github user yanghua commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5869
@zentol normally, it seems you are right. But I don't know if there is any
exception could cause any remained information, at the jm switching moment.
---
Github user zentol commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5869
that shouldn't be possible, as all tasks are removed when a TM
disassociates from the JM which also implies removing all metrics related to a
specific task.
---
Github user yanghua commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5869
@zentol if we just remove it from `disassociateFromJobManager ` and do not
clear and reinitialize it, when a new job manager reconnect to the task manager
, it would remain some tasks' information
Github user yanghua commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5869
cc @tillrohrmann
---
Github user yanghua commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5869
cc @zentol would you like to have a look?
---
Github user yanghua commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5869
cc @zentol @GJL
---
Github user yanghua commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5869
cc @zentol
---
Github user yanghua commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5869
cc @tillrohrmann
---
11 matches
Mail list logo
