Github user yanghua commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6123
OK, yes, this PR really make the binary package size more bigger. Closing
this issue...
---
Github user fhueske commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6123
I'm with Till here. The example JARs add very little value. I would be OK
with adding them if this was lightweight, but each example will include the
Table API and its dependencies (incl. Calcite
Github user yanghua commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6123
hi @tillrohrmann I think we should include the table example jar into
Flink's binary distribution just like `batch`, `streaming`, `gelly`, `python`
examples for those people who do not want to try
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6123
Thanks for opening the PR @yanghua. I would need some input from @twalthr
or @fhueske whether it already makes sense to include the Flink table example
programs in Flink's binary distribution.
Github user yanghua commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6123
cc @dawidwys can you review this?
---
Github user yanghua commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6123
cc @fhueske can you review this PR?
---
Github user yanghua commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6123
@twalthr can you have a look?
---
Github user yanghua commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6123
cc @twalthr
---
Github user zentol commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6123
Please provide a reasoning when opening JIRAs, i.e. the answer to "Why
should we make this change?".
---
