[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1528][Gelly] Added Local Clustering Coe...

2015-08-09 Thread vasia
Github user vasia commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/420#issuecomment-129222936 @balidani, I think it'd be better if you close this PR. I don't think we'll add another example after #1000 is merged. I can take over and probably reuse some of your

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1528][Gelly] Added Local Clustering Coe...

2015-08-09 Thread balidani
Github user balidani closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/420 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1528][Gelly] Added Local Clustering Coe...

2015-08-09 Thread balidani
Github user balidani commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/420#issuecomment-129223724 @vasia yes, I'm sorry about not finishing it, but I just did not have the time lately. Cheers! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1528][Gelly] Added Local Clustering Coe...

2015-08-09 Thread vasia
Github user vasia commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/420#issuecomment-129226158 Thats' fine :) Thanks for the fast response! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1528][Gelly] Added Local Clustering Coe...

2015-07-14 Thread StephanEwen
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/420#issuecomment-121174894 Any progress on this pull request, or should it be closed? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1528][Gelly] Added Local Clustering Coe...

2015-06-03 Thread balidani
Github user balidani commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/420#issuecomment-108284218 Yeah, I should definitely finish this! I'll take a look tonight, sorry about that :) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1528][Gelly] Added Local Clustering Coe...

2015-06-03 Thread vasia
Github user vasia commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/420#issuecomment-108283573 Hey @balidani! Would you like to finish this up? It's not really urgent, but it's almost finished and it'd be a pity to abandon :) Someone else could also take

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1528][Gelly] Added Local Clustering Coe...

2015-03-24 Thread vasia
Github user vasia commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/420#issuecomment-85487676 Hi @balidani! I think it's still a bit confusing how this example works. As far as I understand, you expect a directed graph as input, but then you convert it to an

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1528][Gelly] Added Local Clustering Coe...

2015-03-20 Thread balidani
Github user balidani commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/420#issuecomment-84068746 Hi @vasia! I fixed the algorithm, now it will convert all edges to a pair of edges and call `distinct` on the edge set. This gives the correct results now. Thanks! ---

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1528][Gelly] Added Local Clustering Coe...

2015-03-07 Thread vasia
Github user vasia commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/420#issuecomment-77687686 Hi @balidani! Thanks for the example :)) I'm a bit confused about the directed / undirected case. I tried testing with both a directed and an undirected input and both

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1528][Gelly] Added Local Clustering Coe...

2015-03-07 Thread vasia
Github user vasia commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/420#discussion_r25995666 --- Diff: flink-staging/flink-gelly/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/graph/example/LocalClusteringCoefficientExample.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,205 @@ +/* + *

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1528][Gelly] Added Local Clustering Coe...

2015-02-27 Thread balidani
Github user balidani commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/420#issuecomment-76391973 I made the changes @vasia suggested --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1528][Gelly] Added Local Clustering Coe...

2015-02-23 Thread vasia
Github user vasia commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/420#issuecomment-75586167 Does anyone have an idea about this? Is there a way to pass the `HashSetK` type? In any case, even if not, I think it doesn't matter in this case. I believe we

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1528][Gelly] Added Local Clustering Coe...

2015-02-23 Thread balidani
Github user balidani commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/420#issuecomment-75588338 Hi! I agree. I will change the example then :) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well.