Github user uce closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1230
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1230#issuecomment-146507072
Closing this in favour of Tills upcoming PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user uce opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1230
[FLINK-2804] [client, runtime] Add blocking job submission support inâ¦
⦠⦠case of JobManager recovery
This is based on some other PRs. Only review the last commit.
The client submit and
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1230#issuecomment-145812474
I'm on it :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1230#issuecomment-145846664
For the sake of completeness I repost what I've just commented on the last
commit:
I think it would be better to move the `JobManager` retrieval logic into
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1230#issuecomment-145847936
OK, I like your idea! And thanks for finishing it. It depends on the job
graph recovery for the added IT cases to work. I think you can work your way
around the tests, but
