Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1224
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user chiwanpark commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1224#issuecomment-146885004
I'll merge this with addressing @StephanEwen's comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1224#issuecomment-145781279
Looks good, +1 to merge
BTW: I think its not necessary to {@link} the return types - they are
linked anyways in the JavaDoc.
---
If your project is set up
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1224#issuecomment-145811668
+1 to merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user ggevay opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1224
[FLINK-2818] [runtime] Corrected javadocs of *ReduceDriver classes
- "The iterator is handed to the reduce() method of the
ReduceFunction."
In the cases of ReduceDriver and AllReduceDriver,
