[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3583] User configuration visible in web...

2016-03-14 Thread aljoscha
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1768#issuecomment-196300410 Thanks a lot! I merged it. Could you please close this PR if github does not do so automatically. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3583] User configuration visible in web...

2016-03-14 Thread fijolekProjects
Github user fijolekProjects commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1768#issuecomment-196258570 Hi @aljoscha I can confirm that after merging #1583 this change looks good --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3583] User configuration visible in web...

2016-03-14 Thread aljoscha
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1768#issuecomment-196251716 Hi @fijolekProjects, could you please confirm that everything works now that #1583 is merged. If yes, then I would like to merge this one as well. --- If your

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3583] User configuration visible in web...

2016-03-12 Thread fijolekProjects
Github user fijolekProjects commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1768#issuecomment-195774252 Thanks, I removed backend changes --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3583] User configuration visible in web...

2016-03-08 Thread aljoscha
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1768#issuecomment-193730962 Ok, makes sense. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3583] User configuration visible in web...

2016-03-08 Thread StephanEwen
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1768#issuecomment-193730582 I think that #1583 also addresses parts this, in a more generic fashion. Reading the config earlier should not be a problem. I would vote to get first

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3583] User configuration visible in web...

2016-03-08 Thread aljoscha
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1768#issuecomment-193720952 Thanks for your PR! I'll look into whether loading the ExecutionConfig earlier breaks anything and then merge it. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3583] User configuration visible in web...

2016-03-08 Thread aljoscha
Github user aljoscha commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1768#discussion_r55342808 --- Diff: flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/executiongraph/ExecutionGraph.java --- @@ -306,6 +306,12 @@ public ExecutionGraph(

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3583] User configuration visible in web...

2016-03-04 Thread fijolekProjects
GitHub user fijolekProjects opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1768 [FLINK-3583] User configuration visible in webdashboard when job is running Before: