[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-10-15 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-429834979 Refactored commit message and rebased this PR. This is an automated

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-10-15 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-429817604 In addition, I think we should modify the title of the JIRA issue and this PR. What do you think?

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-10-15 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-429817077 @aljoscha The renaming work has been completed. > As a follow-up, we should change/or add end-to-end tests that use the new Kafka

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-10-14 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-429687222 > Can deserializer access ConsumerRecord to get headers and timestamp? Or it will be PR on top this PR? @alexeyt820 I agree with

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-10-13 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-429524696 @aljoscha I have refactored and separated the commits. This is an

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-10-12 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-429376594 @aljoscha OK, I will refactor the commits and commit messages. This is an

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-10-12 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-429367779 @aljoscha compile and test successfully, what I should do next? This is an

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-10-12 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-429301742 > Could you please also mark the consumer and producer as `@PublicEvolving`? > And we could probably add the Javadoc from

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-10-12 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-429266318 @aljoscha when I rename 'Kafka20TableSink' -> 'KafkaTableSink', but 'KafkaTableSink' exists in 'flink-connector-kafka-base'. Shall we

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-10-12 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-429259771 @aljoscha Yes, the test passed. I will change the module name later, but there is a little doubt. If no version number is added, the user

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-10-11 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-428882816 yes, thanks for your solution @aljoscha . I will take a look about the failed test case because of timeout.

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-10-10 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-428619000 @aljoscha still many failed test cases because of timeout and ClassNotFound.

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-10-10 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-428544751 @aljoscha yes, you are right, I have update the PR. This is an automated

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-10-10 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-428518943 @aljoscha OK, I will try it soon. This is an automated message from the

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-10-10 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-428502808 > @yanghua The internals code (and most of the code in general) you were able to copy from the other connectors, correct? What did you have

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-10-10 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-428465111 @aljoscha some test cases which used kafka-server, failed with this exception : ``` java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-10-09 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-428242063 @alexeyt820 thanks for paying attention to this PR. I am trying to fix some test issue. Based on the community's efficiency, It may not

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-10-01 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-425935918 @pnowojski Ok, what I am currently doing is removing the cascading dependencies in flink-connector-kafka-2.0. And verify the correctness of

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-09-24 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-423929496 OK, @aljoscha This PR currently mainly proves that most of the source code of flink-connector-kafka-0.11 is compatible with kafka client

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-09-19 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-422778285 @pnowojski If we don't consider the failed test case, then this PR applies to both Kafka client 1.0 and kafka client 2.0. Basically it also

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-09-17 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-422008333 I have already read the comment for this method, yes, it will cause the test program to become unresponsive. But each PR will verify this

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-09-17 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-421998532 @pnowojski OK. There is a test case `testOneToOneAtLeastOnceRegularSink` always can not been passed, I am trying to find the reason.

[GitHub] yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0

2018-09-15 Thread GitBox
yanghua commented on issue #6703: [FLINK-9697] Provide connector for Kafka 2.0.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6703#issuecomment-421693803 Currently this PR is not ready to be reviewed, it still needs some refactoring.