zentol commented on issue #6452: [FLINK-9739] Regression in supported
filesystems for RocksDB
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6452#issuecomment-412561511
When would a relative path make sense, and wouldn't this always result in
effectively random behavior?
I would be fine
zentol commented on issue #6452: [FLINK-9739] Regression in supported
filesystems for RocksDB
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6452#issuecomment-409131603
In order to restore the previous behavior we will have to go with the
proposed solution.
Please also adjust the error
zentol commented on issue #6452: [FLINK-9739] Regression in supported
filesystems for RocksDB
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6452#issuecomment-408851714
Note that this of course could break setups where people actually use `:` as
a separate :/
zentol commented on issue #6452: [FLINK-9739] Regression in supported
filesystems for RocksDB
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6452#issuecomment-408851475
yes that would be my suggestion.
This is an automated
zentol commented on issue #6452: [FLINK-9739] Regression in supported
filesystems for RocksDB
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6452#issuecomment-408846731
I'm well aware that `:` was explicitly introduced to support multiple file
paths, my point is that it (in hindsight) wasn't a
zentol commented on issue #6452: [FLINK-9739] Regression in supported
filesystems for RocksDB
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6452#issuecomment-408833311
Looks like splitting on `:` was intentional (see #2482).
