[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Kurt Young closed FLINK-16363.
------------------------------

> Correct the execution behavior of TableEnvironment and StreamTableEnvironment
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-16363
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16363
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Table SQL / API
>            Reporter: godfrey he
>            Assignee: godfrey he
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.11.0
>
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Both {{TableEnvironment.execute()}} and 
> {{StreamExecutionEnvironment.execute}} can trigger a Flink table program 
> execution. However if you use {{TableEnvironment}} to build a Flink table 
> program, you must use {{TableEnvironment.execute()}} to trigger execution, 
> because you can’t get the {{StreamExecutionEnvironment}} instance. If you use 
> {{StreamTableEnvironment}} to build a Flink table program, you can use both 
> to trigger execution. If you convert a table program to a {{DataStream}} 
> program (using 
> {{StreamExecutionEnvironment.toAppendStream/toRetractStream}}), you also can 
> use both to trigger execution. So it’s hard to explain which `execute` method 
> should be used.
> To correct current messy trigger point, we propose that: for 
> {{TableEnvironment}} and {{StreamTableEnvironment}}, you must use 
> {{TableEnvironment.execute()}} to trigger table program execution, once you 
> convert the table program to a {{DataStream}} program (through 
> {{toAppendStream}} or {{toRetractStream}} method), you must use 
> {{StreamExecutionEnvironment.execute}} to trigger the {{DataStream}} program.
> please refer to 
> [FLIP-84|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-84%3A+Improve+%26+Refactor+API+of+TableEnvironment]
>  for more detail.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to