[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17359829#comment-17359829
]
Jingsong Lee commented on FLINK-19847:
--
Even if we want to support nested table join, it should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17222084#comment-17222084
]
Jark Wu commented on FLINK-19847:
-
Yes, it is recommended to specify multiple flat fields rather than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17222042#comment-17222042
]
xiaogang zhou commented on FLINK-19847:
---
looks like splitJoinCondition already has some problem,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17222033#comment-17222033
]
xiaogang zhou commented on FLINK-19847:
---
In our situation, we use a Asynclookup for the redis and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17222027#comment-17222027
]
Jark Wu commented on FLINK-19847:
-
[~zhoujira86] could you describe your use case and why you need the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17222026#comment-17222026
]
xiaogang zhou commented on FLINK-19847:
---
[~jark] Please help review, thx
> Can we create a fast
