[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-23721) Flink SQL state TTL has no effect when using non-incremental RocksDBStateBackend

2022-06-05 Thread Yun Tang (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17550260#comment-17550260 ] Yun Tang commented on FLINK-23721: -- [~xiaokunBit], the managed memory is fully used as you use RocksDB

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-23721) Flink SQL state TTL has no effect when using non-incremental RocksDBStateBackend

2022-06-02 Thread liangxiaokun (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17545393#comment-17545393 ] liangxiaokun commented on FLINK-23721: -- Hello! I have the same question with [~lmagics] In my main

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-23721) Flink SQL state TTL has no effect when using non-incremental RocksDBStateBackend

2021-08-29 Thread Yun Tang (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17406527#comment-17406527 ] Yun Tang commented on FLINK-23721: -- [~lmagics] could you share the code example to reproduce this on

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-23721) Flink SQL state TTL has no effect when using non-incremental RocksDBStateBackend

2021-08-27 Thread Q Kang (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17405782#comment-17405782 ] Q Kang commented on FLINK-23721: [~yunta] [~jark]  According to my observation, there are 2

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-23721) Flink SQL state TTL has no effect when using non-incremental RocksDBStateBackend

2021-08-27 Thread Jark Wu (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17405676#comment-17405676 ] Jark Wu commented on FLINK-23721: - As far as I can tell, the {{table.exec.state.ttl}} should have taken

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-23721) Flink SQL state TTL has no effect when using non-incremental RocksDBStateBackend

2021-08-27 Thread Yun Tang (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17405659#comment-17405659 ] Yun Tang commented on FLINK-23721: -- [~lmagics] From the code implementation, what you described is

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-23721) Flink SQL state TTL has no effect when using non-incremental RocksDBStateBackend

2021-08-27 Thread Q Kang (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17405637#comment-17405637 ] Q Kang commented on FLINK-23721: [~yunta] Sorry for the late reply. For RocksDB backend, we configured

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-23721) Flink SQL state TTL has no effect when using non-incremental RocksDBStateBackend

2021-08-20 Thread Yun Tang (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17402322#comment-17402322 ] Yun Tang commented on FLINK-23721: -- [~lmagics] Whether enable incremental checkpoints has no