[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-5719) Let LatencyMarkers completely bypass operators / chains

2021-04-29 Thread Flink Jira Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17336806#comment-17336806 ] Flink Jira Bot commented on FLINK-5719: --- This issue was labeled "stale-major" 7 ago and has not

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-5719) Let LatencyMarkers completely bypass operators / chains

2021-04-22 Thread Flink Jira Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17328834#comment-17328834 ] Flink Jira Bot commented on FLINK-5719: --- This major issue is unassigned and itself and all of its

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-5719) Let LatencyMarkers completely bypass operators / chains

2017-02-08 Thread Robert Metzger (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15857797#comment-15857797 ] Robert Metzger commented on FLINK-5719: --- Yes, changing from PublicEvolving to Internal is good! I

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-5719) Let LatencyMarkers completely bypass operators / chains

2017-02-06 Thread Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15853960#comment-15853960 ] Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai commented on FLINK-5719: One note: Currently, the {{LatencyMarker}} class