[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-9565) Evaluating scalar UDFs in parallel

2021-04-29 Thread Flink Jira Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17336623#comment-17336623 ] Flink Jira Bot commented on FLINK-9565: --- This issue was labeled "stale-major" 7 ago and has not

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-9565) Evaluating scalar UDFs in parallel

2021-04-22 Thread Flink Jira Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17328621#comment-17328621 ] Flink Jira Bot commented on FLINK-9565: --- This major issue is unassigned and itself and all of its

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-9565) Evaluating scalar UDFs in parallel

2018-06-27 Thread Fabian Hueske (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16524814#comment-16524814 ] Fabian Hueske commented on FLINK-9565: -- I agree, we should follow a consistent style here. But I

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-9565) Evaluating scalar UDFs in parallel

2018-06-27 Thread Timo Walther (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16524798#comment-16524798 ] Timo Walther commented on FLINK-9565: - We don't need a new eval function for it. I would prefer

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-9565) Evaluating scalar UDFs in parallel

2018-06-27 Thread yinhua.dai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16524641#comment-16524641 ] yinhua.dai commented on FLINK-9565: --- [~fhueske] [~twalthr] So there are two options: #1. using

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-9565) Evaluating scalar UDFs in parallel

2018-06-21 Thread Fabian Hueske (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16519212#comment-16519212 ] Fabian Hueske commented on FLINK-9565: -- Hi [~yinhua], These are the relevant guides: *

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-9565) Evaluating scalar UDFs in parallel

2018-06-21 Thread yinhua.dai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16519054#comment-16519054 ] yinhua.dai commented on FLINK-9565: --- [~fhueske] Yes I am. Could you forward me a contribute guide,

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-9565) Evaluating scalar UDFs in parallel

2018-06-20 Thread Fabian Hueske (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16517975#comment-16517975 ] Fabian Hueske commented on FLINK-9565: -- This seems to be a rather specific issue. [~yinhua] Are you

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-9565) Evaluating scalar UDFs in parallel

2018-06-20 Thread yinhua.dai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16517958#comment-16517958 ] yinhua.dai commented on FLINK-9565: --- [~fhueske] [~twalthr] Just wondering whether this could be

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-9565) Evaluating scalar UDFs in parallel

2018-06-12 Thread Timo Walther (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16509361#comment-16509361 ] Timo Walther commented on FLINK-9565: - [~fhueske] we could also just introduce a new method in

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-9565) Evaluating scalar UDFs in parallel

2018-06-12 Thread Fabian Hueske (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16509306#comment-16509306 ] Fabian Hueske commented on FLINK-9565: -- One option to add such a feature could be to provide an