[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477438#comment-16477438
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9373:
---
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
GitHub user azagrebin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6024
[FLINK-9301] [e2e test] Add back "not co mini cluster" test with reduced
parallelism
â¦ced to 25 parallelism and memory usage logging
## What is the purpose of the change
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Zhang updated FLINK-9384:
-
Flags: Patch
> KafkaAvroTableSource failed to work due to type mismatch
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Till Rohrmann reassigned FLINK-9381:
Assignee: Till Rohrmann
> BlobServer data for a job is not getting cleaned up at JM
>
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6020
After double checking with the RocksDB docs, I am afraid that we need to
introduce more checks because for example the point out that also after methods
like `seek` the iterator an become
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477549#comment-16477549
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9373:
---
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6020
Oh My God...Is that means we need to wrap the `RocksIterator` to delegate
all it API?
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477554#comment-16477554
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9373:
---
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477556#comment-16477556
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9373:
---
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6020
It depends, maybe this is already covered currently because we might always
do an iteration attempt that checks right after the seek. But in general, this
is not very nice and fragile if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477560#comment-16477560
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9373:
---
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6020
Maybe we should ask them on their issue tracker what the best practise is?
I cannot remember seeing such checks in their code examples. Have a hard time
to believe that this can be true,
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6020
Agreed!
---
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6020
@StefanRRichter I had a look at the implementation of the iterators in
RocksDB, I found status just return the flag first `_status` as the result
without any complex computation, But for some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477465#comment-16477465
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9373:
---
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6020
Agree, should be correct first before fast! Could you please have a look at
this? I think it's already for a look now~
---
Github user azagrebin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5421
@zhangminglei
what do you think about creation one more `ProgramInvocationException`
overloaded constructor with JobId as parameter? It could always append to the
message like `MESSAGE +
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477600#comment-16477600
]
Till Rohrmann commented on FLINK-9381:
--
I think we don't properly clean up the job resources after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477648#comment-16477648
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8659:
---
Github user kl0u commented on the issue:
Github user kl0u commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5955
Hi @tzulitai ! Thanks for the review. I integrated most of your comments.
The only one I left out is the one about merging the checkpointing and the
checking. I am not against that. It is just that the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477433#comment-16477433
]
Sihua Zhou commented on FLINK-8918:
---
[~fhueske] related to the saturated problem, I want to add some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477459#comment-16477459
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9373:
---
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6020
It sounds cheap if they just `&` all the flags from the sub iterators. In
the end, we can see if there is a performance drop but better be correct first
before fast.
---
Jun Zhang created FLINK-9384:
Summary: KafkaAvroTableSource failed to work due to type mismatch
Key: FLINK-9384
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9384
Project: Flink
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Zhang updated FLINK-9384:
-
Attachment: flink-9384.patch
> KafkaAvroTableSource failed to work due to type mismatch
>
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6020
FYI, I found this issue related to problem:
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/3558
---
Josh Lemer created FLINK-9385:
-
Summary: Operators with two inputs should show "Records Received"
in Web UI separately, rather than added together
Key: FLINK-9385
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9385
Github user zhangminglei commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5823#discussion_r188645244
--- Diff: flink-end-to-end-tests/test-scripts/test_quickstarts.sh ---
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477502#comment-16477502
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9008:
---
Github user zhangminglei commented on a diff in the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477581#comment-16477581
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8573:
---
Github user azagrebin commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477452#comment-16477452
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9301:
---
GitHub user azagrebin opened a pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477453#comment-16477453
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9301:
---
Github user azagrebin commented on the issue:
Github user azagrebin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6024
cc @zentol
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477592#comment-16477592
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9373:
---
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Josh Lemer updated FLINK-9385:
--
Component/s: Webfrontend
Web Client
Metrics
> Operators with two
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477479#comment-16477479
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9008:
---
Github user zhangminglei commented on a diff in the pull
Github user zhangminglei commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5823#discussion_r188638639
--- Diff: flink-end-to-end-tests/test-scripts/test_quickstarts.sh ---
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
GitHub user zhgao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6025
Release 1.4
*Thank you very much for contributing to Apache Flink - we are happy that
you want to help us improve Flink. To help the community review your
contribution in the best possible way,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477573#comment-16477573
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9373:
---
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chesnay Schepler updated FLINK-9370:
Affects Version/s: (was: 1.5.0)
1.6.0
> Activate distributed
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6019
@StefanRRichter I definitely agree with your point! The timers should be
considered as keyed state is a beautiful way to go!
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477360#comment-16477360
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9182:
---
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477362#comment-16477362
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-9043:
-
Thank you for the discussion. To me, there are two essential
Github user aljoscha commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5896
@suez1224 Did you rebase on master? I think that krb5-specific could should
not be there anymore.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477393#comment-16477393
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9373:
---
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6020
Yes, but eventually it will also return `false`, which is essentially the
same as waiting until the loop terminates. Anyways, I think after the loop is
the nicer way.
---
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6020
I'm going to check the native implementation and see whether the `status()`
is a super cheap option...
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477313#comment-16477313
]
Chesnay Schepler commented on FLINK-9381:
-
Searching for {{BlobServer#cleanupJob}} only yields
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kostas Kloudas reassigned FLINK-9379:
-
Assignee: Kostas Kloudas
> HA end-to-end test failing locally
>
Github user kl0u commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5955#discussion_r188614213
--- Diff:
flink-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/test/checkpointing/utils/StatefulJobWBroadcastStateMigrationITCase.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,418 @@
+/*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477394#comment-16477394
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8286:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on the issue:
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6020
Also from the RocksDB docs: `In another word, if Iterator::Valid() is true,
status() is guaranteed to be OK()`
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477397#comment-16477397
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9373:
---
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477309#comment-16477309
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9373:
---
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6020
The reasons that the travis given red light is unrelated...
---
Amit Jain created FLINK-9381:
Summary: BlobServer data for a job is not getting cleaned up at JM
Key: FLINK-9381
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9381
Project: Flink
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477369#comment-16477369
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9174:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on the issue:
Github user aljoscha commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5847
Sorry for the delay @sihuazhou I have a few minor touchups that I'll apply
while merging. ð
And thanks for discovering this and fixing it. ð
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477373#comment-16477373
]
Sihua Zhou commented on FLINK-8918:
---
Hi [~fhueske] thank you very much for your reply, you are right
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477373#comment-16477373
]
Sihua Zhou edited comment on FLINK-8918 at 5/16/18 12:49 PM:
-
Hi [~fhueske]
Chesnay Schepler created FLINK-9382:
---
Summary: Inconsistent file storage behavior in FileCache
Key: FLINK-9382
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9382
Project: Flink
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477387#comment-16477387
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9373:
---
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6020
You could also in `isRocksIteratorValid` run the check only if the return
value is `false` if you like the helper method to avoid people forgetting about
this check.
---
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6020
@StefanRRichter No, I didn't have any performance tests yet. I think you
are right! Your proposal is the way I'm going to choose. Addressing this...
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477413#comment-16477413
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9373:
---
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477424#comment-16477424
]
Fabian Hueske commented on FLINK-8918:
--
It's good to know that you were thinking about the issues I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477294#comment-16477294
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9303:
---
Github user EAlexRojas commented on a diff in the pull
Github user EAlexRojas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5991#discussion_r188596584
--- Diff:
flink-connectors/flink-connector-kafka-0.9/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/connectors/kafka/internal/KafkaConsumerThread.java
---
@@
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477359#comment-16477359
]
yuqi commented on FLINK-8918:
-
# Indeed as the streaming applications runs, bloom filter will definitely goes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477389#comment-16477389
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9373:
---
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
Github user aljoscha commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5896
@EronWright the fix is really one this:
https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/ba3e2711a2091b7c0907a5caf3ea527f837a442f
But I haven't yet managed to reproduce a failure on my system without the
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6020
Oh you are right, this is confusing :-) So does this also mean the status
flag is cleared when we simple continue iterating and only check in the end?
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477414#comment-16477414
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9373:
---
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
Till Rohrmann created FLINK-9380:
Summary: Failing end-to-end tests should not clean up logs
Key: FLINK-9380
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9380
Project: Flink
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chesnay Schepler updated FLINK-9381:
Component/s: JobManager
> BlobServer data for a job is not getting cleaned up at JM
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477383#comment-16477383
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9373:
---
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6020
A quick general question: could you observe any performance impact from
calling the `status()` method in the loops. It looks like a native method and I
am not sure that it is inexpensive.
Github user aljoscha commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5735
I think I'd favour the second approach because the default value is closer
to where the return value is used. If it's define "far away" when defining the
state descriptor it's easier for code to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477382#comment-16477382
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9036:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477399#comment-16477399
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9373:
---
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477404#comment-16477404
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6336:
---
Github user rsingh2411 commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477412#comment-16477412
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9373:
---
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6020
I think I am a bit torn here now...
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477417#comment-16477417
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9383:
---
GitHub user zentol opened a pull request:
GitHub user zentol opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6023
[FLINK-9383][runtime] Test directories in DistributedCache E2E test
## What is the purpose of the change
With this PR the distributed cache end-to-end test
* also covers the distributed
Till Rohrmann created FLINK-9379:
Summary: HA end-to-end test failing locally
Key: FLINK-9379
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9379
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477353#comment-16477353
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9182:
---
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6019
@sihuazhou my plan was to integrate the timer service more closely with the
keyed state backends, starting from the point that we are merging the PR for
timers in RocksDB. I think timers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477363#comment-16477363
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-9043:
-
[~ariskkol] I remember you asked about this feature once - how
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477365#comment-16477365
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9182:
---
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6019
Yes, the only reason I did not start with this is that I first wanted to
wait for the completion and merge of the RocksDB timer service to have a
complete picture.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aljoscha Krettek closed FLINK-9174.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.5.0)
1.5.1
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6020
@StefanRRichter NO, I think that couldn't fix this issue, the problem here
is that even `iterator.isValid()` return `true`, there may also some internal
error in RocksDB. What do you think?
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477391#comment-16477391
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8286:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477406#comment-16477406
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9373:
---
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chesnay Schepler updated FLINK-9383:
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
> Extend DistributedCache E2E test to cover directories
Github user sihuazhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6020
I think that is the incorrect one, If I'm not confused by the wiki's
content...
---
Github user rsingh2411 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3744
Getting similar error, whileadding Unique host constraint. How did you fix
that
imestamp=2018-05-16 10:52:34,105 LogLevel=ERROR
ThreadId=[flink-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-3]
Chesnay Schepler created FLINK-9383:
---
Summary: Extend DistributedCache E2E test to cover directories
Key: FLINK-9383
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9383
Project: Flink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chesnay Schepler closed FLINK-9369.
---
Resolution: Invalid
> DistributedCache returns parent directory for directories
>
101 - 200 of 282 matches
Mail list logo
