[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596099#comment-14596099
]
Maximilian Michels commented on FLINK-2235:
---
Actually, I think the explanation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi resolved FLINK-2204.
Resolution: Fixed
Tez ConnectedComponentsStepITCase fails spuriously on Travis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596210#comment-14596210
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-297:
--
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull
Github user mbalassi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/855#issuecomment-114179961
Merging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/750#issuecomment-114188551
I disagree with the execution graph changes. I took us 6 months to get it
stable, and we still discover corner cases. The new state interacts with all
other states.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596266#comment-14596266
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2111:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the
Github user mbalassi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/835#issuecomment-114149626
I do not think that we can expect that every user starts from the
quickstart poms, but it is true that a reference to that would have been nicer.
I have to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596107#comment-14596107
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2244:
-
This is a very generic/broad feature.
This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596116#comment-14596116
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2186:
-
Not sure if we can/want to fix this on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596111#comment-14596111
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2235:
---
GitHub user mxm opened a pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596084#comment-14596084
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2230:
-
There have been many discussions about whether
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596087#comment-14596087
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1727:
---
Github user thvasilo commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596187#comment-14596187
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2245:
-
I would actually assume that programs with
Github user mbalassi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/857#issuecomment-114184152
Thanks for spotting this, Gabor. Looks good to merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/811#issuecomment-114153093
Thanks, merging then.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user hsaputra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/747#discussion_r32949021
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-streaming/flink-streaming-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/state/PartitionedStreamOperatorState.java
---
@@
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596102#comment-14596102
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2235:
-
Sounds like a good way to fix this...
Local
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596071#comment-14596071
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2231:
-
Exactly, the createTypeInformation macro needs
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/677#issuecomment-114176858
I think it will. I will try and add further code for the new webfrontend in
the next days, and then open a new pull request that subsumes this one and #297
---
If
Github user uce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/859#discussion_r32957111
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/util/EnvironmentInformation.java
---
@@ -137,7 +137,13 @@ public static long
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596228#comment-14596228
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2235:
---
Github user uce commented on a diff in the
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/856#issuecomment-114184385
Here seems to be something with quite some broader implications. This
affects the design of aggregations on windows and how they can be
pre-aggregated.
The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596127#comment-14596127
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2175:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596188#comment-14596188
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2245:
-
Ah, sorry, confusion: You were talking about
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/754#issuecomment-114176855
Addressed @tillrohrmann's comments and rebased on master. @tillrohrmann,
should we merge with your upcoming changes or can we merge it before?
---
If your project is set up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596209#comment-14596209
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2119:
---
Github user uce commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596068#comment-14596068
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2209:
---
Github user mbalassi commented on the pull
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/707#issuecomment-114165604
+1 for adding this, looks good!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/855#issuecomment-114177459
Looks good, +1 to merge
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user senorcarbone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/747#issuecomment-114180337
We have added a `KeyedDataStream` type to the API as you can see in the
last commit. It is basically a supertype of `GroupDataStream` and represents a
`DataStream`
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/811
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user thvasilo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#issuecomment-114154438
Helo @sachingoel0101, I've started reviewing this PR. It would help a lot
if you check out these initial comments I made and try to fix similar issues
throughout the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596100#comment-14596100
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2236:
-
I think this is fixed in the release, correct?
GitHub user mxm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/859
[FLINK-2235] fix calculation of free memory for local execution
The Java runtime may return Long.MAX_VALUE for a call to the maxMemory()
method of the Runtime class. In these cases, we simply use the
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#issuecomment-114173765
The fundamental idea for a scalable decision tree algorithm is to reduce
the number of splits required to be checked at every node. Ideally, we'd check
for every
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596253#comment-14596253
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2255:
---
Github user mbalassi commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596254#comment-14596254
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2143:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the
Github user thvasilo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#discussion_r32941921
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/classification/DecisionTree.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,490 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user thvasilo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#discussion_r32942116
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/classification/DecisionTree.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,490 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user thvasilo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#discussion_r32942958
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/tree/Tree.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,327 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user thvasilo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#discussion_r32943140
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/tree/Tree.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,327 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user thvasilo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#discussion_r32944309
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/classification/DecisionTree.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,490 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596054#comment-14596054
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2209:
-
Reopened this, because I think this
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/835#issuecomment-114143834
I am a bit confused here. With the quickstart maven projects, fat jar
building works without configuring, as it defines proper assembly and share
configurations for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596378#comment-14596378
]
Theodore Vasiloudis commented on FLINK-2244:
It would work differently for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596436#comment-14596436
]
Aljoscha Krettek commented on FLINK-2236:
-
Yes, in the release the RowSerializer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596523#comment-14596523
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2194:
---
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the
Github user thvasilo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#discussion_r32941719
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/classification/DecisionTree.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,490 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596043#comment-14596043
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2209:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the
Github user thvasilo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#discussion_r32944368
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/classification/DecisionTree.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,490 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user thvasilo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#discussion_r32944538
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/classification/DecisionTree.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,490 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stephan Ewen reopened FLINK-2209:
-
Assignee: (was: Márton Balassi)
Document how to use TableAPI, Gelly and FlinkML,
Github user thvasilo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#discussion_r32944486
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/classification/DecisionTree.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,490 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596056#comment-14596056
]
Theodore Vasiloudis commented on FLINK-2108:
Hello Sachin, could you give us a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596391#comment-14596391
]
Theodore Vasiloudis commented on FLINK-2245:
Yup for me the important thing
Github user thvasilo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#issuecomment-114211636
On that front, do you think it's possible to split the online histogram and
the decision tree code into two PRs that we can review separately?
If the online
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596585#comment-14596585
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2180:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14596574#comment-14596574
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2261:
---
GitHub user gyfora opened a pull request:
GitHub user gyfora opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/860
[FLINK-2261] [streaming] Remove reduce/fold/aggregations from DataStream
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gyfora/flink FLINK-2261
Greg Hogan created FLINK-2262:
-
Summary: ParameterTool API misnamed function
Key: FLINK-2262
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2262
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14595725#comment-14595725
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2193:
-
I think there is currently no partition
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14595738#comment-14595738
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2198:
-
The approach to disallow folder creation is
Github user szape commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/853#discussion_r32925004
--- Diff:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/850
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14595813#comment-14595813
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2243:
---
Github user mjsax commented on a diff in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14595830#comment-14595830
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2197:
-
How can we solve this? Can we change the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14595800#comment-14595800
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2243:
---
Github user szape commented on a diff in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14595818#comment-14595818
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2190:
-
Sounds good!
Enhance stream
GitHub user ggevay opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/856
[FLINK-2143] Added ReduceFunctionWithInverse
(The first commit is the same as the second commit in PR 684)
I didn't add an overload to reduce, but instead created
ReduceFunctionWithInverse
Márton Balassi created FLINK-2256:
-
Summary: Handling Broker failures on the KafkaSink side
Key: FLINK-2256
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2256
Project: Flink
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14595497#comment-14595497
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2243:
---
Github user szape commented on a diff in
Github user szape commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/853#discussion_r32913535
--- Diff:
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/811#issuecomment-114039683
Is there anything blocking this? If not, feel free to go ahead and merge
this. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/842#issuecomment-114039557
+1, merging
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/642#issuecomment-114040994
Another ping. @mjsax would you like to pick it up? There is a test in
TaskCancelTest#cancelJob, which implements this for a test as a static method.
Would be nice to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14595511#comment-14595511
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1818:
---
Github user uce commented on the pull
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/844#issuecomment-114045049
The build side hinted here is also the constant (loop invariant) side,
correct?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user jreiffers commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/848#discussion_r32916185
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-streaming/flink-streaming-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/functions/source/FromElementsFunction.java
---
@@
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14595545#comment-14595545
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2124:
---
Github user jreiffers commented on a diff
Github user jreiffers commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/848#discussion_r32916595
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-streaming/flink-streaming-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/functions/source/FromElementsFunction.java
---
@@
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14595557#comment-14595557
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2124:
---
Github user jreiffers commented on a diff
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/790
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14595571#comment-14595571
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-297:
--
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
Github user mjsax commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/853#discussion_r32919318
--- Diff:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14595706#comment-14595706
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2243:
---
Github user mjsax commented on a diff in
Github user mjsax commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/764#issuecomment-114054802
Sure. Why not. Let's discuss tomorrow at the Meetup.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14595769#comment-14595769
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1956:
---
GitHub user mbalassi opened a pull request:
GitHub user mbalassi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/855
[streaming] Properly forward rich window function calls to wrapped fuâ¦
â¦nctions
Open and close were not called, because of the wrapping in windowing. I
should have realized this when
Github user mjsax commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/853#discussion_r32925744
--- Diff:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14595824#comment-14595824
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2143:
---
GitHub user ggevay opened a pull request:
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/814#issuecomment-114080543
I am unsure of where this leads us. The purpose of `Writable` is to make
sure that we can use the Writable's custom serialization. If the type
`Writable` itself is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14595827#comment-14595827
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2194:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14595485#comment-14595485
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2243:
---
Github user szape commented on a diff in
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/850#issuecomment-114038819
Merging. Thanks for the PR. Going for getClass.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/642#issuecomment-114044225
Ah, didn't check the JIRA. Thanks for pointing this out. @rainiraj, can you
look at the test I've mentioned and remove the code there and use your new
feature? :)
---
If
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/852#issuecomment-114043900
+1
I would go as far as to remove it, as this will work in a very limited way
and requires direct client to TaskManager communication.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi resolved FLINK-2155.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.10
Fixed via ab40e5d.
Add an additional checkstyle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14595572#comment-14595572
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2155:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request
Github user mjsax commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/853#discussion_r32914310
--- Diff:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14595508#comment-14595508
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2243:
---
Github user mjsax commented on a diff in
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo