[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642597#comment-14642597
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2405:
---
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/940#issuecomment-125177948
By the way, you don't need to open another pull request for updating it.
Just force-push into the branch this PR is based on (`Feature2`).
---
If your project is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642622#comment-14642622
]
Maximilian Michels commented on FLINK-2404:
---
Although the performance impact
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642641#comment-14642641
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2406:
---
Github user uce commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642683#comment-14642683
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2408:
---
Github user aalexandrov commented on the
Github user aalexandrov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/941#issuecomment-125192692
I guess the s in the name is the giveaway...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642702#comment-14642702
]
Robert Metzger commented on FLINK-2213:
---
It does not affect the amount of CPU
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Till Rohrmann reassigned FLINK-2409:
Assignee: Till Rohrmann
Old JM web interface is sending cancel messages w/o leader ID
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642605#comment-14642605
]
Sachin Goel commented on FLINK-2404:
I'm using jdk8, specifically release 1.8.0_45 on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642600#comment-14642600
]
Sachin Goel edited comment on FLINK-2404 at 7/27/15 11:51 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642606#comment-14642606
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2408:
---
GitHub user rmetzger opened a pull request:
GitHub user rmetzger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/941
[FLINK-2408] Define all maven properties outside build profiles
See JIRA issue for details.
@aalexandrov, can you take a look at this?
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/885#issuecomment-125187262
Okay, I tried it again and you are right. It seems to create the artifacts
correctly.
I was confused because
a) the reactor summary didn't contain the variable:
Github user aalexandrov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/941#issuecomment-125189988
If sbt can resolve profile-based dependencies this should be OK.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642678#comment-14642678
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2391:
---
Github user ffbin commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642680#comment-14642680
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2410:
---
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull
Github user ffbin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/940#issuecomment-125192161
Thank you very much!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642590#comment-14642590
]
Andra Lungu commented on FLINK-1815:
Sure Faye, you're added :P
One first challenge I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642589#comment-14642589
]
Sachin Goel commented on FLINK-2404:
I ran a dummy filter job to test any performance
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642600#comment-14642600
]
Sachin Goel edited comment on FLINK-2404 at 7/27/15 11:49 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642618#comment-14642618
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2405:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642619#comment-14642619
]
Maximilian Michels commented on FLINK-2404:
---
I think it makes more sense to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642634#comment-14642634
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2408:
---
Github user aalexandrov commented on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642665#comment-14642665
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2408:
---
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642667#comment-14642667
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2410:
---
GitHub user twalthr opened a pull request:
GitHub user twalthr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/943
[FLINK-2410] [java api] PojoTypeInfo is not completely serializable
The type `java.reflect.Field` is not Serializable and has to be serialized
manually, which was not implemented until now in
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/943#issuecomment-125191411
Thank you for the PR.
Can you add a test case validating the fix?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user twalthr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/943#issuecomment-125203795
I have created a separate test. But the idea is good. I will create a Table
API example from my current code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/936#issuecomment-125175011
I don't know of a better solution than the current approach if we want to
support the `stateByKey` parameter. I agree with Aljoscha that
`ds.mapWithState({ (x, o) =
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642607#comment-14642607
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2391:
---
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642623#comment-14642623
]
Rico Bergmann commented on FLINK-2325:
--
Just checked it, but it's still the same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
fangfengbin updated FLINK-2391:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: Thank you very much!)
Storm-compatibility:method
Github user twalthr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/943#issuecomment-125191888
The lines are basically copied from PojoComparator but yes I can add a test
case for it ;)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642602#comment-14642602
]
Maximilian Michels commented on FLINK-2404:
---
The performance impact might differ
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/938#issuecomment-125183346
From Gyulas's comment in #937, there seems to be a deadlock. @gyfora, can
you provide more input?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642733#comment-14642733
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2399:
---
GitHub user sachingoel0101 opened a pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642600#comment-14642600
]
Sachin Goel commented on FLINK-2404:
In fact, here are some detailed timings under the
Github user aalexandrov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/941#issuecomment-125182364
Then it should be good to merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/943#issuecomment-125192186
I would just use the Table API example you've posted in the JIRA and add
another IT case for the Table API
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642620#comment-14642620
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2161:
---
Github user nikste commented on the pull
Github user nikste commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/805#issuecomment-125179652
The IT case now looks for a jar inside the ml-folder which does not contain
test or original.
Thus the IT case should work for different flink-versions as long as the
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/936#issuecomment-125179431
You actually make a good point. Since one cannot apply multiple
transformations while keeping a KeyedDataStream, we can assume stateByKey true
on a keyedDataStream,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642644#comment-14642644
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2406:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642654#comment-14642654
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2408:
---
Github user chiwanpark commented on the
Github user chiwanpark commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/941#issuecomment-125185305
Hi, pom.xml file of flink-scala module has also profile based dependency
setting. Is it okay without modification?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Timo Walther created FLINK-2410:
---
Summary: PojoTypeInfo is not completely serializable
Key: FLINK-2410
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2410
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642662#comment-14642662
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2408:
---
Github user aalexandrov commented on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642631#comment-14642631
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2408:
---
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/941#issuecomment-125181480
I don't think that I'm removing the activation of the `scala-2.11` profile.
If the `scala-2.11` property is set, the default value of the property will
be
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/938#issuecomment-125184157
This is the same issue as in Stephan's build:
https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/72752909
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/941#issuecomment-125191075
sbt can't do that.
We are lucky here because the `maven-shade-plugin` is generating a
dependency-reduced pom with the effective settings.
(Take a look in your
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/936#issuecomment-125212680
I updated the PR according to the comments, and added an IT case that tests
all 3 functions. (map-localstate, flatmap-localstate, filter-partitionedstate)
Let's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642730#comment-14642730
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2405:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642599#comment-14642599
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2391:
---
Github user mjsax commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642623#comment-14642623
]
Rico Bergmann edited comment on FLINK-2325 at 7/27/15 12:02 PM:
Github user aalexandrov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/941#issuecomment-125180542
Is the removal of the property-based activation (`-Dscala-2.11`) also
intentional? I think this might be used in the travis.yml.
---
If your project is set up for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642626#comment-14642626
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2408:
---
Github user aalexandrov commented on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642657#comment-14642657
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2200:
---
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642658#comment-14642658
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2404:
---
GitHub user sachingoel0101 opened a pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642674#comment-14642674
]
fangfengbin commented on FLINK-2391:
Thank you very much!
Storm-compatibility:method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642672#comment-14642672
]
fangfengbin commented on FLINK-2391:
Thank you very much!
Storm-compatibility:method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642675#comment-14642675
]
fangfengbin commented on FLINK-2391:
Thank you very much!
Storm-compatibility:method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642673#comment-14642673
]
fangfengbin commented on FLINK-2391:
Thank you very much!
Storm-compatibility:method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
fangfengbin updated FLINK-2391:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: Thank you very much!)
Storm-compatibility:method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
fangfengbin updated FLINK-2391:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: Thank you very much!)
Storm-compatibility:method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642713#comment-14642713
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2410:
---
Github user twalthr commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642743#comment-14642743
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2399:
---
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the
Martin Junghanns created FLINK-2411:
---
Summary: Add basic graph summarization algorithm
Key: FLINK-2411
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2411
Project: Flink
Issue Type: New
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Junghanns updated FLINK-2411:
Description:
Graph summarization determines a structural grouping of similar vertices and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Junghanns updated FLINK-2411:
Description:
Graph summarization determines a structural grouping of similar vertices and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Junghanns updated FLINK-2411:
Description:
Graph summarization determines a structural grouping of similar vertices and
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/936#issuecomment-125259161
Travis apparently passes (there was some unrelated Kafka error), so if no
objections I will merge this tomorrow :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user sachingoel0101 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/944
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642967#comment-14642967
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2405:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642994#comment-14642994
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2324:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull
Github user mjsax commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/940#issuecomment-125261373
+1 for merging
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642943#comment-14642943
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2391:
---
Github user mjsax commented on the pull
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/936#issuecomment-125265963
Sure, go ahead. :smile:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Andra Lungu created FLINK-2412:
--
Summary: Index Out of Bounds Exception
Key: FLINK-2412
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2412
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/937#issuecomment-125268029
Definitely.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14643024#comment-14643024
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2200:
---
Github user chiwanpark commented on the
Github user chiwanpark commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/885#issuecomment-125271970
There is wrong description in building documentation. Because Scala 2.11
profile activation is determined by property scala-2.11, Scala 2.10 profile
is activated when
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/937#issuecomment-125266560
We should try to find out what the problem was in the beginning, let's wait
for @StephanEwen. I think @rmetzger is also investigating the issue.
---
If your project is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14643257#comment-14643257
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2200:
---
Github user chiwanpark commented on the
Github user chiwanpark commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/885#issuecomment-125319617
When we upgrade version of maven-shade-plugin to 2.4.1, the property in
current project artifactId is interpolated properly. But the property in parent
artifactId is
Piotr Godek created FLINK-2414:
--
Summary: Extend job data in job list
Key: FLINK-2414
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2414
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
Piotr Godek created FLINK-2415:
--
Summary: Link nodes in plan to vertices
Key: FLINK-2415
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2415
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
Piotr Godek created FLINK-2413:
--
Summary: Provide real vertex data
Key: FLINK-2413
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2413
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14643494#comment-14643494
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1789:
---
Github user twalthr commented on the pull
Github user twalthr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/593#issuecomment-125359065
I have rebased the PR and added commits of @aalexandrov that introduce a
CLI option `--classpath`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642523#comment-14642523
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2405:
---
Github user gyfora commented on a diff in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642522#comment-14642522
]
Faye Beligianni commented on FLINK-1815:
Nice! I will maybe pink you for any
Github user gyfora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/936#discussion_r35521195
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-streaming/flink-streaming-scala/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/scala/DataStreamTest.scala
---
@@ -332,13 +359,23
Robert Metzger created FLINK-2408:
-
Summary: Some maven properties are defined in build profiles only
Key: FLINK-2408
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2408
Project: Flink
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/937#issuecomment-125156345
So far it seems to work rebased on #938 (but I am getting some test
failures due to some deadlock in that PR).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642535#comment-14642535
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2324:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull
Robert Metzger created FLINK-2409:
-
Summary: Old JM web interface is sending cancel messages w/o
leader ID
Key: FLINK-2409
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2409
Project: Flink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642382#comment-14642382
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2243:
---
Github user szape commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642411#comment-14642411
]
Vasia Kalavri commented on FLINK-2127:
--
Is this one still a problem?
The GSA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14642421#comment-14642421
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1962:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
