[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-16444) Count the read/write/seek/next latency of RocksDB as metrics
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17286910#comment-17286910
]
Yu Li commented on FLINK-16444:
---
After some more investigation, the metrics we plan to add here should compare
with [Kafka state store
metrics|https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/#kafka_streams_store_monitoring]
instead of [statistics and properties based
metrics|https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/#kafka_streams_rocksdb_monitoring].
I did some comparison between properties-based metrics listed in KIP-607 and
[those exist in
Flink|https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.12/deployment/config.html#rocksdb-native-metrics],
and confirmed that {{live-sst-files-size}} is the only one we're missing and
may consider to add.
Regarding the [statistics-based
metrics|https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Statistics], it seems we don't
have them in Flink. It seems to be a little bit off-track to discuss here and
let's create some other JIRAs to follow up.
> Count the read/write/seek/next latency of RocksDB as metrics
>
>
> Key: FLINK-16444
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16444
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Runtime / State Backends
>Reporter: Yun Tang
>Assignee: Yun Tang
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.13.0
>
>
> Currently, user cannot know the read/write/seek/next latency of RocksDB, we
> could add these helpful metrics to know the overall state performance. To not
> affect the action performance much, we could introduce counter to only record
> the latency at interval of some actions.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-21220) Change the type of cpuCores in ResourceProfile to CPUResource
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17286908#comment-17286908
]
Yangze Guo commented on FLINK-21220:
[~chesnay] I think it has the following benefits:
- No need to check the argument type of the {{cpuCores}} when construct
{{ResourceProfile}}.
- No need to manually do the type conversion when call the
{{ResourceProfile#getCpuCores}}.
> Change the type of cpuCores in ResourceProfile to CPUResource
> -
>
> Key: FLINK-21220
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21220
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Runtime / Coordination
>Reporter: Yangze Guo
>Priority: Minor
> Labels: starter
>
> The {{cpuCores}} field in {{ResourceProfile}} should always be the
> CPUResource. There is no need to generalize it to {{Resource}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[GitHub] [flink] rmetzger commented on a change in pull request #14950: [FLINK-21347][coordination] Extract interface from ExecutionGraph
rmetzger commented on a change in pull request #14950:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14950#discussion_r578985730
##
File path:
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/scheduler/declarative/StateTrackingMockExecutionGraph.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,459 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.flink.runtime.scheduler.declarative;
+
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.ArchivedExecutionConfig;
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.ExecutionConfig;
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.JobID;
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.JobStatus;
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.accumulators.Accumulator;
+import org.apache.flink.configuration.Configuration;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.JobException;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.accumulators.AccumulatorSnapshot;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.accumulators.StringifiedAccumulatorResult;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.blob.BlobWriter;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.blob.PermanentBlobKey;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.checkpoint.CheckpointCoordinator;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.checkpoint.CheckpointIDCounter;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.checkpoint.CheckpointStatsSnapshot;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.checkpoint.CheckpointStatsTracker;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.checkpoint.CheckpointsCleaner;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.checkpoint.CompletedCheckpointStore;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.checkpoint.MasterTriggerRestoreHook;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.concurrent.ComponentMainThreadExecutor;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.execution.ExecutionState;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ErrorInfo;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.Execution;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionAttemptID;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionDeploymentListener;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionGraph;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionJobVertex;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionVertex;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.IntermediateResult;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.JobInformation;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.JobStatusListener;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.TaskExecutionStateTransition;
+import
org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.failover.flip1.ResultPartitionAvailabilityChecker;
+import
org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.failover.flip1.partitionrelease.PartitionReleaseStrategy;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.partition.JobMasterPartitionTracker;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.partition.ResultPartitionID;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.jobgraph.IntermediateDataSetID;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.jobgraph.JobVertex;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.jobgraph.JobVertexID;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.jobgraph.ScheduleMode;
+import
org.apache.flink.runtime.jobgraph.tasks.CheckpointCoordinatorConfiguration;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.query.KvStateLocationRegistry;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.scheduler.InternalFailuresListener;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.scheduler.strategy.SchedulingTopology;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.shuffle.ShuffleMaster;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.state.CheckpointStorage;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.state.StateBackend;
+import org.apache.flink.types.Either;
+import org.apache.flink.util.OptionalFailure;
+import org.apache.flink.util.SerializedValue;
+
+import javax.annotation.Nonnull;
+import javax.annotation.Nullable;
+
+import java.util.Collections;
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.Optional;
+import java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture;
+import java.util.concurrent.Executor;
+import java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool;
+
+/**
+ * Mocked ExecutionGraph which (partially) tracks the job status, and provides
some basic mocks to
+ * create an {@link
org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ArchivedExecutionGraph} from this
+ * ExecutionGraph.
+ */
+class StateTrackingMockExecutionGraph implements ExecutionGraph {
+private JobStatus state = JobStatus.INITIALIZING;
+private final
[GitHub] [flink] rmetzger commented on a change in pull request #14950: [FLINK-21347][coordination] Extract interface from ExecutionGraph
rmetzger commented on a change in pull request #14950:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14950#discussion_r578985387
##
File path:
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/scheduler/declarative/StateTrackingMockExecutionGraph.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,459 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.flink.runtime.scheduler.declarative;
+
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.ArchivedExecutionConfig;
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.ExecutionConfig;
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.JobID;
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.JobStatus;
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.accumulators.Accumulator;
+import org.apache.flink.configuration.Configuration;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.JobException;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.accumulators.AccumulatorSnapshot;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.accumulators.StringifiedAccumulatorResult;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.blob.BlobWriter;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.blob.PermanentBlobKey;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.checkpoint.CheckpointCoordinator;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.checkpoint.CheckpointIDCounter;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.checkpoint.CheckpointStatsSnapshot;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.checkpoint.CheckpointStatsTracker;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.checkpoint.CheckpointsCleaner;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.checkpoint.CompletedCheckpointStore;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.checkpoint.MasterTriggerRestoreHook;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.concurrent.ComponentMainThreadExecutor;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.execution.ExecutionState;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ErrorInfo;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.Execution;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionAttemptID;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionDeploymentListener;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionGraph;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionJobVertex;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionVertex;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.IntermediateResult;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.JobInformation;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.JobStatusListener;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.TaskExecutionStateTransition;
+import
org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.failover.flip1.ResultPartitionAvailabilityChecker;
+import
org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.failover.flip1.partitionrelease.PartitionReleaseStrategy;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.partition.JobMasterPartitionTracker;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.partition.ResultPartitionID;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.jobgraph.IntermediateDataSetID;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.jobgraph.JobVertex;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.jobgraph.JobVertexID;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.jobgraph.ScheduleMode;
+import
org.apache.flink.runtime.jobgraph.tasks.CheckpointCoordinatorConfiguration;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.query.KvStateLocationRegistry;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.scheduler.InternalFailuresListener;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.scheduler.strategy.SchedulingTopology;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.shuffle.ShuffleMaster;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.state.CheckpointStorage;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.state.StateBackend;
+import org.apache.flink.types.Either;
+import org.apache.flink.util.OptionalFailure;
+import org.apache.flink.util.SerializedValue;
+
+import javax.annotation.Nonnull;
+import javax.annotation.Nullable;
+
+import java.util.Collections;
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.Optional;
+import java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture;
+import java.util.concurrent.Executor;
+import java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool;
+
+/**
+ * Mocked ExecutionGraph which (partially) tracks the job status, and provides
some basic mocks to
+ * create an {@link
org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ArchivedExecutionGraph} from this
+ * ExecutionGraph.
+ */
+class StateTrackingMockExecutionGraph implements ExecutionGraph {
+private JobStatus state = JobStatus.INITIALIZING;
+private final
[GitHub] [flink] XComp commented on a change in pull request #14798: [FLINK-21187] Provide exception history for root causes
XComp commented on a change in pull request #14798:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14798#discussion_r578786368
##
File path:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/scheduler/SchedulerBase.java
##
@@ -635,6 +641,33 @@ public void cancel() {
return
executionGraph.getTerminationFuture().thenApply(FunctionUtils.nullFn());
}
+protected void archiveGlobalFailure(Throwable failure) {
+taskFailureHistory.add(
+new ErrorInfo(failure,
executionGraph.getStatusTimestamp(JobStatus.FAILED)));
+log.debug("Archive global failure.", failure);
+}
+
+protected void archiveFromFailureHandlingResult(FailureHandlingResult
failureHandlingResult) {
+Optional executionOptional =
+failureHandlingResult
+.getExecutionVertexIdOfFailedTask()
+.map(this::getExecutionVertex)
+.map(ExecutionVertex::getCurrentExecutionAttempt);
+
+executionOptional.ifPresent(
+execution ->
+execution
+.getFailureInfo()
+.ifPresent(
+failureInfo -> {
+
taskFailureHistory.add(failureInfo);
+log.debug(
+"Archive local failure
causing attempt {} to fail: {}",
+execution.getAttemptId(),
+
failureInfo.getExceptionAsString());
+}));
Review comment:
But looking into that again, I realize that there is, indeed, the
`failureInfo` in `ExecutionGraph` that is set during
[handleTaskFailure](https://github.com/XComp/flink/blob/8e732bfb2bddc38ec7422f482dcda4be3d296408/flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/scheduler/DefaultScheduler.java#L218)
and
[handleGlobalFailure](https://github.com/XComp/flink/blob/8e732bfb2bddc38ec7422f482dcda4be3d296408/flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/scheduler/DefaultScheduler.java#L236).
This is used to forward the current root cause of the `ExecutionGraph` to the
Web UI. I could have used that. But the drawback is that it's using
`System.currentMillis`.
Instead, I'm gonna work on removing the `ExecutionGraph.failureInfo` (and
related methods) as part of FLINK-21190. It becomes redundant after we enable
to exception history since it's just the exception history's last entry.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] rmetzger commented on a change in pull request #14963: [FLINK-21362][coordination] Move State.onEnter() logic into constructor
rmetzger commented on a change in pull request #14963:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14963#discussion_r578983459
##
File path:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/scheduler/declarative/DeclarativeScheduler.java
##
@@ -907,20 +909,37 @@ public void runIfState(State expectedState, Runnable
action, Duration delay) {
//
+/** Note: Do not call this method from a State constructor. */
@VisibleForTesting
-void transitionToState(State newState) {
-if (state != newState) {
-LOG.debug(
-"Transition from state {} to {}.",
-state.getClass().getSimpleName(),
-newState.getClass().getSimpleName());
-
-State oldState = state;
-oldState.onLeave(newState.getClass());
-
-state = newState;
-newState.onEnter();
-}
+ void transitionToState(StateFactory targetState) {
+Preconditions.checkState(
+state != null, "State transitions are now allowed while
construcing a state.");
+Preconditions.checkState(
+state.getClass() != targetState.getStateClass(),
+"Attempted to transition into the very state the scheduler is
already in.");
+
+LOG.debug(
+"Transition from state {} to {}.",
+state.getClass().getSimpleName(),
+targetState.getStateClass().getSimpleName());
+
+State oldState = state;
+oldState.onLeave(targetState.getStateClass());
+
+// Guard against state transitions while constructing state objects.
+//
+// Consider the following scenario:
+// Scheduler is in state Restarting, once the cancellation is
complete, we enter the
+// transitionToState(WaitingForResources) method.
+// In the constructor of WaitingForResources, we call
`notifyNewResourcesAvailable()`, which
+// finds resources and enters transitionsToState(Executing). We are in
state Executing. Then
+// we return from the methods and go back in our call stack to the
+// transitionToState(WaitingForResources) call, where we overwrite
Executing with
+// WaitingForResources. And there we have it, a deployed execution
graph, and a scheduler
+// that is in WaitingForResources.
+state = null;
Review comment:
It would probably work with the tests, since we collect and manually
trigger all scheduled executions in the close() method, before checking if the
expected state transitions happened.
But I'm not sure if it's worth introducing such behavior for the sake of
removing the onEnter() method.
One of the reasons why we agreed to remove onEnter() was because the change
revealed a few test inaccuracies. Basically all of these inaccuracies have been
found and fixed during the review of the respective tests. The onEnter()
prototype was just done on an unreviewed version of the tests.
Right now, WaitingForResources is the only state that triggers state
transitions in the constructor.
I would actually propose to revisit the decision to remove the onEnter()
method, given the compromises we have to do to make it work (CC @tillrohrmann )
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14950: [FLINK-21347][coordination] Extract interface from ExecutionGraph
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14950: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14950#issuecomment-780426957 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit a8191e6800961467c726695c8ef7575d157a (Fri Feb 19 07:34:50 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14944: [FLINK-21297] Support 'LOAD/UNLOAD MODULE' syntax
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14944: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14944#issuecomment-779311077 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 073e7d7aea71ed9b4b2806821a7172a92b9f26ec (Fri Feb 19 07:35:01 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14951: [FLINK-21380][coordination] Hide terminal ExecutionGraph in StateWithExecutionGraph
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14951: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14951#issuecomment-780564498 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 75d0067ce378ce84d7e8edbe1810cf85bdcab9fb (Fri Feb 19 07:34:47 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14928: [FLINK-21360][coordination] Make resource timeout configurable
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14928: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14928#issuecomment-06506 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 20915f746d6fd359f00a6f7a77aa3b7c349a94fb (Fri Feb 19 07:34:43 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14897: [FLINK-21221][runtime] Deduplication for multiple ResourceCounters
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14897: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14897#issuecomment-775027203 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 06c2bdca6652a653ece66c02c5a96d79326662e6 (Fri Feb 19 07:34:40 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14798: [FLINK-21187] Provide exception history for root causes
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14798: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14798#issuecomment-769218666 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit e962af6d8df77a725defeb92537837e6f685292f (Fri Feb 19 07:34:36 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14964: [FLINK-21410][docs] Document checkpoint interval trade-offs
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14964: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14964#issuecomment-781635100 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 63cafd0fe1c8c1c43e69f5acf5faf1256073dcea (Fri Feb 19 07:34:32 UTC 2021) ✅no warnings Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14838: [FLINK-19503][state] Add StateChangelog API
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14838: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14838#issuecomment-772050707 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 000fa3e28def66c51ebf7b5975d8b6106988 (Fri Feb 19 07:34:25 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14847: [FLINK-21030][runtime] Add global failover in case of a stop-with-savepoint failure
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14847: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14847#issuecomment-772363532 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 36b3d657e3fa3151aac181d709706dadf58c9d0f (Fri Feb 19 07:34:29 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14916: [FLINK-21345][Table SQL / Planner] Fix BUG of Union All join Temporal…
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14916: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14916#issuecomment-776602074 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 13b22ab740f81a326927caa4f344bbafab336a54 (Fri Feb 19 07:34:14 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! * **This pull request references an unassigned [Jira ticket](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21345).** According to the [code contribution guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/contribute-code.html), tickets need to be assigned before starting with the implementation work. Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14835: [FLINK-21213][task] Degrade log level to INFO when ignore to decline checkpoint as task not running
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14835: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14835#issuecomment-771610358 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 6ecaa1370de5c2681bef2aa1f84ebaba2623f217 (Fri Feb 19 07:34:03 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14084: [FLINK-15867][table-planner-blink] Support time-related types for FIRST_VALUE and LAST_VALUE aggregate functions
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14084: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14084#issuecomment-728287751 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit a74b9bc950d5a3e42953e2a46535914e8299a208 (Fri Feb 19 07:34:21 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14822: [FLINK-21005][table-api] Introduce new provider for unified Sink API and implement in planner
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14822: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14822#issuecomment-770392199 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 4b0b591d6cc06d0eacc83f9277147d55af6ddf78 (Fri Feb 19 07:34:06 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14958: [FLINK-18550][sql-client] use TableResult#collect to get select result for sql client
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14958: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14958#issuecomment-781095248 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 15a2ba54d452e3f88ca92ed2820b8e58285a7058 (Fri Feb 19 07:34:10 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * **1 pom.xml files were touched**: Check for build and licensing issues. Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14953: [FLINK-21351][checkpointing] Don't subsume last checkpoint
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14953: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14953#issuecomment-780745633 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 07d008483dd496a4b89fe34e799511e3e2670fb8 (Fri Feb 19 07:34:17 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14284: [FLINK-20324] Added Configuration mount support
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14284: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14284#issuecomment-736661194 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 79e46eb71823e08b4462a22c024fad6a71f4e3dd (Fri Feb 19 07:33:44 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! * **This pull request references an unassigned [Jira ticket](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20324).** According to the [code contribution guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/contribute-code.html), tickets need to be assigned before starting with the implementation work. Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14942: [FLINK-21377][coordination][tests] Make JobMaster QS tests pass with declarative scheduler
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14942: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14942#issuecomment-779277958 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit cc47ee2609f502da2645d7514dd4ee5df2e4e94b (Fri Feb 19 07:33:51 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14743: [FLINK-21366][doc] mentions Maxwell as CDC tool in Kafka connector documentation
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14743: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14743#issuecomment-766411085 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit ddfdd750a01fd31b928217912ecbb4e901304b75 (Fri Feb 19 07:33:40 UTC 2021) ✅no warnings Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13912: [FLINK-19466][FLINK-19467][runtime / state backends] Add Flip-142 public interfaces and methods
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13912: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13912#issuecomment-721387578 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit be0265377b7c2c15d73a540c8b174f2dab613b1a (Fri Feb 19 07:33:59 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14949: [FLINK-21384][docs] Automatically copy maven dependencies to clipboard on click
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14949: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14949#issuecomment-780082194 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 3ab70c7f0969506b71a5854edd9e0633d0f6b90b (Fri Feb 19 07:33:54 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14265: FLINK-15649 and FLINK-20359. Adding Volume and Configuration Mount decorators and Owner reference
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14265: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14265#issuecomment-736166155 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit c607feb35e47f92401ab0763f789cdcc9e14c5bc (Fri Feb 19 07:33:47 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14773: [FLINK-16153] Translate "Operator/windows" into Chinese
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14773: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14773#issuecomment-768224190 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit a63f91ca287d6a68e1bab682e82a0ba80d227ad0 (Fri Feb 19 07:33:19 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14919: [FLINK-21338][test] Relax ITCase naming constraints
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14919: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14919#issuecomment-776676702 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 8a0ecec0b40fca539c5b89c234c48b2dcffd2699 (Fri Feb 19 07:33:36 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * **2 pom.xml files were touched**: Check for build and licensing issues. * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14930: [FLINK-21339][tests] Enable and fix ExceptionUtilsITCase
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14930: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14930#issuecomment-778152501 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 2871d67e16ca1a58ab47320fcac05f36c1011662 (Fri Feb 19 07:33:33 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14819: [FLINK-16152] Translate "Operator/index" into Chinese
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14819: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14819#issuecomment-770317299 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 701cc544e8d2581d76ff9357c47dc36fcdea7528 (Fri Feb 19 07:33:22 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14904: [FLINK-20663][runtime] Instantly release unsafe memory on freeing segment.
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14904: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14904#issuecomment-775636912 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit e4771acc22f44a36ba14772f2f8c83cab8b4dcb3 (Fri Feb 19 07:33:15 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14834: [FLINK-21346][build system] Adding timeout to all tasks
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14834: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14834#issuecomment-771598626 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 49e79c5986cb878e575fb0f6403294eff6a46c48 (Fri Feb 19 07:33:29 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14754: [FLINK-21127][runtime][checkpoint] Stores finished status for fully finished operators in checkpoint
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14754: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14754#issuecomment-766954030 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 0f8924698701b1d6768f8757414d69836b83fa3a (Fri Feb 19 07:33:07 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! * **This pull request references an unassigned [Jira ticket](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21127).** According to the [code contribution guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/contribute-code.html), tickets need to be assigned before starting with the implementation work. Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14878: [FLINK-21245][table-planner-blink] Support StreamExecCalc json serialization/deserialization
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14878: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14878#issuecomment-773871449 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit d87084638f2714de24bfc578c88f852eda0613ee (Fri Feb 19 07:33:04 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * **1 pom.xml files were touched**: Check for build and licensing issues. * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14910: [FLINK-21259] Add Failing state for DeclarativeScheduler
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14910: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14910#issuecomment-775968981 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 723dc6290b3c32381684f2dd9052baf927bb47fd (Fri Feb 19 07:33:26 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13512: [FLINK-19457][core] Add a number sequence generating source for the New Source API.
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13512: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13512#issuecomment-700988929 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit bd5d4611cef1611e8a18fa4dc0c93e5a1da6f88d (Fri Feb 19 07:32:37 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13341: [FLINK-15854][hive][table-planner-blink] Use the new type inference f…
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13341: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13341#issuecomment-688330393 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit ee58a70cab9c228ed0bfeb861b6b9ba120383b57 (Fri Feb 19 07:32:59 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14913: [FLINK-21344] Support switching from/to rocks db with heap timers
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14913: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14913#issuecomment-776205983 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 9ef552dc3d5ef4cb214d6d1d9c012d633721889a (Fri Feb 19 07:33:11 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * **1 pom.xml files were touched**: Check for build and licensing issues. * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13606: [FLINK-19554][e2e] Implement a unified testing framework for connectors
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13606: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13606#issuecomment-707527003 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 255385512f07d5d5812f64be562d592dcb0090f4 (Fri Feb 19 07:32:56 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * **4 pom.xml files were touched**: Check for build and licensing issues. * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13830: [FLINK-14482][rocksdb] Bump FRocksDB verion to base on RocksDB-6.11.6
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13830: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13830#issuecomment-718324551 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit a536dc1bbcc4f9e1604cda0cbaa7521179fe2356 (Fri Feb 19 07:32:48 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * **1 pom.xml files were touched**: Check for build and licensing issues. * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13509: [FLINK-19317] Make EventTime the default TimeCharacteristic
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13509: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13509#issuecomment-700701300 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit a0a68de1fe3c950ca2562f363c5d27e6fc65d35a (Fri Feb 19 07:32:33 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13501: Single task result partition type --- the most original one
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13501: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13501#issuecomment-699941154 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 810706f4c5550bd8691799c78e44aa6a80a132b6 (Fri Feb 19 07:32:44 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! * **Invalid pull request title: No valid Jira ID provided** Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13839: [FLINK-19628][table-planner] Introduce multiple input operator for streaming
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13839: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13839#issuecomment-718624902 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit feeb278e369915410e7eddb5a7e98952db65daa4 (Fri Feb 19 07:32:52 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13375: [FLINK-18815][filesystems][tests] Join SafetyNetCloseableRegistry's reaper thread before assertion
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13375: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13375#issuecomment-691408906 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit ce25c6bbc562da022b86aaa99d24f40c1d159b41 (Fri Feb 19 07:32:41 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❗ 3. Needs [attention] from. - Needs attention by @tillrohrmann [PMC] * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13526: [FLINK-19426][NOT FOR REVIEW] Loop CI failing test with fix and AWS credentials
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13526: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13526#issuecomment-701487982 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 60ba07c303897757f39e22ce66677fe57f6ef177 (Fri Feb 19 07:32:14 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13499: [FLINK-16972][network] LocalBufferPool eagerly fetches global segments to ensure proper availability.
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13499: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13499#issuecomment-699845109 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit fce4a20dcb376d6c0df3671c228a872045f64606 (Fri Feb 19 07:32:06 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13524: [FLINK-19258][docs] Fix the wrong example of "csv.line-delimiter" in CSV documentation
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13524: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13524#issuecomment-701373214 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit b7a069e2cf849fd038003df4a27ab78769a7d900 (Fri Feb 19 07:31:58 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13434: [FLINK-19292][hive] HiveCatalog should support specifying Hadoop conf dir with configuration
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13434: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13434#issuecomment-695890247 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit cda95f3a0ee6988a3852d5e731ad360484bad53a (Fri Feb 19 07:31:44 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13496: [FLINK-18818][filesystem][tests] Ignores exceptions after files written successfully in HadoopRenameCommitter test
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13496: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13496#issuecomment-699820489 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 33d573630e3ca3a5bd6e0303cfd3da398549d495 (Fri Feb 19 07:32:21 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13316: [FLINK-14422][runtime] Expose network memory usage to TaskManagerDetailsHandler's endpoint
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13316: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13316#issuecomment-686390861 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 662baa74869beb65325adf50077abbf7df820b2d (Fri Feb 19 07:31:55 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13527: [FLINK-19426][NOT FOR REVIEW] Loop CI failing test without fix and AWS credentials
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13527: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13527#issuecomment-701489008 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit acbbcd73cb46b2543477d9e5a3d22e7b027cf821 (Fri Feb 19 07:32:17 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13498: [FLINK-19430][docs-zh] Translate page datastream_tutorial into Chinese
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13498: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13498#issuecomment-699828655 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 36e941c325c99378eefbc97d31138fc418ea72fb (Fri Feb 19 07:31:47 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13525: [FLINK-19447][hbase] Run HBase 2.2 integration test only if hadoop version is between 2.8.0 - 3.0.3
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13525: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13525#issuecomment-701430487 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit df45481e9c3a07bcbfac6e070bc16a38fe83f3ce (Fri Feb 19 07:32:24 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13495: [Test]Fix case demo is more obvious to understand for ReinterpretAsKeyedStream
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13495: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13495#issuecomment-699750515 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit d964fbb76ac2b3eda2911eeab5ed6cc2226d8b3c (Fri Feb 19 07:31:51 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! * **Invalid pull request title: No valid Jira ID provided** Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13473: [FLINK-19264][runtime] Add JobID to ExecutionAttemptID
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13473: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13473#issuecomment-698178595 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 4bf412ba5eb808a8307c7c69406712142e81f562 (Fri Feb 19 07:32:28 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13502: [FLINK-19392] Add the execution.runtime-mode
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13502: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13502#issuecomment-700209876 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit b852da3dbb595e42a1807fbd6eb9b3cf5e4ca1f2 (Fri Feb 19 07:32:10 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13511: [FLINK-19388][coordination] Do not remove logical slots from SharedSlot if it is releasing
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13511: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13511#issuecomment-700896253 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 21d879ab8af7995a45ae26bd5020cb9e2341ff40 (Fri Feb 19 07:32:02 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13322: [FLINK-17480][kubernetes] Support running PyFlink on Kubernetes.
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13322: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13322#issuecomment-686856023 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 6683fbc2e524bea9e5328afefab8a8bb48918ea1 (Fri Feb 19 07:30:36 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * **1 pom.xml files were touched**: Check for build and licensing issues. * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13323: FLINK-19137: Bump Parquet from 1.10.0 to 1.11.1
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13323: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13323#issuecomment-686867076 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 084ec77b7f7b01dc6314797cb3fa0aa2455432f7 (Fri Feb 19 07:30:29 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * **1 pom.xml files were touched**: Check for build and licensing issues. * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! * **This pull request references an unassigned [Jira ticket](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19137).** According to the [code contribution guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/contribute-code.html), tickets need to be assigned before starting with the implementation work. Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13497: [FLINK-19429][docs-zh] Translate page `Data Types` into Chinese
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13497: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13497#issuecomment-699821450 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit ef8763e506fce75b66149137f191e4c03483091f (Fri Feb 19 07:30:40 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14944: [FLINK-21297] Support 'LOAD/UNLOAD MODULE' syntax
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #14944: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14944#issuecomment-779315396 ## CI report: * 073e7d7aea71ed9b4b2806821a7172a92b9f26ec Azure: [SUCCESS](https://dev.azure.com/apache-flink/98463496-1af2-4620-8eab-a2ecc1a2e6fe/_build/results?buildId=13482) Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot run travis` re-run the last Travis build - `@flinkbot run azure` re-run the last Azure build This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13503: [FLINK-19445][hbase] Fix guava version conflict in Hbase 1.4 test
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13503: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13503#issuecomment-700527093 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 3c478dd43eba20d4e76a3a92e0f89afd1629e784 (Fri Feb 19 07:30:33 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * **1 pom.xml files were touched**: Check for build and licensing issues. * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13485: [hotfix][typos] Improve exception message of item operator
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13485: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13485#issuecomment-699189501 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 8c088e989deb3d783868642c82c73c1fdd413ab8 (Fri Feb 19 07:30:18 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13001: [FLINK-18627] Get unmatch filter method records to side output
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13001: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13001#issuecomment-664659144 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit c3f193d116c2fa8c322684213cc618fd6d0c71a7 (Fri Feb 19 07:30:26 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! * **This pull request references an unassigned [Jira ticket](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18627).** According to the [code contribution guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/contribute-code.html), tickets need to be assigned before starting with the implementation work. Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13376: [FLINK-19208] Refine the tuple's equals
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13376: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13376#issuecomment-691477620 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 4c4d0d50876b833f457896e68b2ffd2ad0c2c223 (Fri Feb 19 07:30:15 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! * **This pull request references an unassigned [Jira ticket](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19208).** According to the [code contribution guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/contribute-code.html), tickets need to be assigned before starting with the implementation work. Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13367: [FLINK-17818][flink-java] Fixed the CSV Reader API: CSV Reader was not parsing data when no field names are passed as an argument. Ad
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13367: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13367#issuecomment-689636564 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 817abe90ee59cb5896cf7681d47658a162758f58 (Fri Feb 19 07:30:22 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13356: [FLINK-16789][runtime][rest] Enable JMX RMI port retrieval via REST API
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13356: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13356#issuecomment-688932162 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 174ea945be035310bd0f27bc3d00af5c815cda3d (Fri Feb 19 07:30:11 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13489: [hotfix][docs]Fix the FROM_UNIXTIME UTC sample time error
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13489: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13489#issuecomment-699593480 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 085372c3425a2a9109a6edfca26cd3fe0e2c0358 (Fri Feb 19 07:30:03 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] rmetzger commented on a change in pull request #14963: [FLINK-21362][coordination] Move State.onEnter() logic into constructor
rmetzger commented on a change in pull request #14963:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14963#discussion_r578980290
##
File path:
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/scheduler/declarative/RestartingTest.java
##
@@ -209,6 +210,7 @@ public void close() throws Exception {
NoOpExecutionDeploymentListener.get(),
(execution, newState) -> {},
0L);
+setJsonPlan("");
Review comment:
This will be removed again once the ExecutionGraph interface PR has been
merged. If I don't set the JSON plan, creating an archived execution graph will
fail.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13493: [FLINK-19433] [docs] Correct example of FROM_UNIXTIME function in document
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13493: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13493#issuecomment-699637870 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 18baa5ec57c9dd038aa04bf84b81488ece0bb220 (Fri Feb 19 07:30:00 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13438: [FLINK-19014][e2e] Increase startup timeout
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13438: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13438#issuecomment-696033365 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 4e3397e2476210d441ceefab6802d4bbab1053c8 (Fri Feb 19 07:30:07 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! * **This pull request references an unassigned [Jira ticket](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19014).** According to the [code contribution guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/contribute-code.html), tickets need to be assigned before starting with the implementation work. Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #11124: [Hotfix]Add suffix L to WatermarkGeneratorCodeGenTest#testAscendingWatermark long type fields
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #11124: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/11124#issuecomment-587466792 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit db6e83ebe93f974cbf0699e53a6f6be74ed6d27a (Fri Feb 19 07:29:53 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! * **Invalid pull request title: No valid Jira ID provided** Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #11016: [FLINK-15677][TABLE-COMMON]Use physical field names for the default implementation of Tablesource#explainSource
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #11016: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/11016#issuecomment-581929780 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 21fd4c9abd35d33e6e14e0b637e1cf9b4185b338 (Fri Feb 19 07:29:49 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! * **This pull request references an unassigned [Jira ticket](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15677).** According to the [code contribution guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/contribute-code.html), tickets need to be assigned before starting with the implementation work. Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13387: [Hotfix][typos]Modify debug log to print the compiling code
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13387: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13387#issuecomment-692403820 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 5ae3077ffa0d5f79358008be1515a7985706c062 (Fri Feb 19 07:29:56 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! * **Invalid pull request title: No valid Jira ID provided** Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13128: [FLINK-18795][hbase] Support for HBase 2
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13128: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13128#issuecomment-672762320 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 8dcdccd0b97ed873d628f831642786103b8f8878 (Fri Feb 19 07:28:46 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * **7 pom.xml files were touched**: Check for build and licensing issues. * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13450: [FLINK-19339] Support unions with logical types in Avro >= 1.9.x
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13450: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13450#issuecomment-696546030 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit d4084790b05f22ceaf246d018eab3f31ba95805a (Fri Feb 19 07:28:40 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13391: Update README.md
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13391: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13391#issuecomment-692521993 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 5e703c1d7506b3ce608057b8c16aedaed9c67d4b (Fri Feb 19 07:28:37 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! * **Invalid pull request title: No valid Jira ID provided** Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13491: [FLINK-19417][python] Fix the bug of the method from_data_stream in table_environement
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13491: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13491#issuecomment-699619059 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit f998eecfa23b9ed74ac2eb95a4b390d8efb6d849 (Fri Feb 19 07:28:29 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13483: [FLINK-19403][python] Support Pandas Stream Group Window Aggregation
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13483: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13483#issuecomment-698898915 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit cceb5e966e81fc80a43d64325c7d155fa70825c8 (Fri Feb 19 07:28:25 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13419: [FLINK-18842][e2e] Added 10min timeout to building the container.
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13419: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13419#issuecomment-694737982 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 2934e6f7d875ee5c6be368884baab4fd2e3797b0 (Fri Feb 19 07:28:33 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13283: [FLINK-18759][tests] Add readme.md for TPC-DS tools
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13283: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13283#issuecomment-683585889 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 62f40cd28a36147d84a77b499e63b6224df8b038 (Fri Feb 19 07:28:18 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13301: [FLINK-19121][hive] Avoid accessing HDFS frequently in HiveBulkWriterFactory
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13301: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13301#issuecomment-685329829 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit a5a665a041c0a6c2c017289463e5122f2c8f6282 (Fri Feb 19 07:28:14 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13484: [FLINK-19419][Connectors][HBase] "null-string-literal" does not work in HBaseSource decoder
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13484: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13484#issuecomment-698926455 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 163753486bb991b2bd670f91e5e213791644f3af (Fri Feb 19 07:28:22 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! * **This pull request references an unassigned [Jira ticket](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19419).** According to the [code contribution guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/contribute-code.html), tickets need to be assigned before starting with the implementation work. Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13462: [FLINK-19421][python] Introduces rules and python side implementation to ensure the basic functionality of the general Python UDAF.
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13462: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13462#issuecomment-697267879 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit de30de5e091feb6a9fe731ceff575ea2242f5ba9 (Fri Feb 19 07:28:10 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13303: [FLINK-19098][format] Make row data converters public
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13303: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13303#issuecomment-685543479 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit e65696be08fc766fb96afc45f5c6ea9cbd91e99b (Fri Feb 19 07:28:06 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13478: [FLINK-19411][task] Fix construction of MultipleInputStreamTask with union inputs
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13478: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13478#issuecomment-698800040 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 02aa9969825717890772997f583ff0b3751b30be (Fri Feb 19 07:28:02 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13471: [FLINK-19124][datastream] Some JobClient methods are not ergonomic, require ClassLoader argument
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13471: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13471#issuecomment-698150143 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 56ba62dd0ca89a5037144d5401d9aee23a7caed2 (Fri Feb 19 07:27:55 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13466: [FLINK-18907][task] Add watermarks and metrics tests for MultipleSourceOperatorStreamTask
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13466: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13466#issuecomment-697452573 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 8f6944d92d2efb3095c3b57dc95657c23507c3d5 (Fri Feb 19 07:27:58 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] zentol commented on a change in pull request #14950: [FLINK-21347][coordination] Extract interface from ExecutionGraph
zentol commented on a change in pull request #14950:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14950#discussion_r578978899
##
File path:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/executiongraph/ExecutionGraph.java
##
@@ -1021,203 +220,20 @@ public ArchivedExecutionConfig
getArchivedExecutionConfig() {
*
* @return Termination future of this {@link ExecutionGraph}.
*/
-public CompletableFuture getTerminationFuture() {
-return terminationFuture;
-}
+CompletableFuture getTerminationFuture();
@VisibleForTesting
-public JobStatus waitUntilTerminal() throws InterruptedException {
-try {
-return terminationFuture.get();
-} catch (ExecutionException e) {
-// this should never happen
-// it would be a bug, so we don't expect this to be handled and
throw
-// an unchecked exception here
-throw new RuntimeException(e);
-}
-}
-
-//
-// State Transitions
-//
-
-public boolean transitionState(JobStatus current, JobStatus newState) {
-return transitionState(current, newState, null);
-}
-
-private void transitionState(JobStatus newState, Throwable error) {
-transitionState(state, newState, error);
-}
+JobStatus waitUntilTerminal() throws InterruptedException;
-private boolean transitionState(JobStatus current, JobStatus newState,
Throwable error) {
-assertRunningInJobMasterMainThread();
-// consistency check
-if (current.isTerminalState()) {
-String message = "Job is trying to leave terminal state " +
current;
-LOG.error(message);
-throw new IllegalStateException(message);
-}
+boolean transitionState(JobStatus current, JobStatus newState);
-// now do the actual state transition
-if (state == current) {
-state = newState;
-LOG.info(
-"Job {} ({}) switched from state {} to {}.",
-getJobName(),
-getJobID(),
-current,
-newState,
-error);
+void incrementRestarts();
-stateTimestamps[newState.ordinal()] = System.currentTimeMillis();
-notifyJobStatusChange(newState, error);
-return true;
-} else {
-return false;
-}
-}
+void initFailureCause(Throwable t);
-public void incrementRestarts() {
-numberOfRestartsCounter.inc();
-}
+void vertexFinished();
Review comment:
If we made sure that the Execution* classes all work against the
DefaultExecutionGraph then we should be able to remove this and other
package-private methods.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13475: [FLINK-19372][python] Support Pandas Batch Over Window Aggregation
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13475: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13475#issuecomment-698231583 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 49b713bf213887f8a97bd6b83f81aad4d12a1b55 (Fri Feb 19 07:26:50 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13327: [FLINK-19134][python] Add BasicArrayTypeInfo and coder for PrimitiveArrayTypeInfo for Python DataStream API.
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13327: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13327#issuecomment-686987024 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 2d5f8f486f57852dcb453bb60200c57e332df39a (Fri Feb 19 07:26:43 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-5717) NPE on SessionWindows with ContinuousProcessingTimeTrigger
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ASF GitHub Bot updated FLINK-5717:
--
Labels: easyfix pull-request-available starter (was: easyfix starter)
> NPE on SessionWindows with ContinuousProcessingTimeTrigger
> --
>
> Key: FLINK-5717
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5717
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: API / DataStream
>Affects Versions: 1.1.4, 1.2.0
>Reporter: Oriol Orellana
>Assignee: Lijie Wang
>Priority: Major
> Labels: easyfix, pull-request-available, starter
>
> The same bug as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4862, but for
> ContinuousProcessingTimeTrigger. I copied the description from that same
> issue.
> *what's the error?*
> The following NPE error is thrown when SessionWindows with
> ContinuousProcessingTimeTrigger is used.
> {code:borderStyle=solid}
> Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
> at
> org.apache.flink.streaming.api.windowing.triggers.ContinuousProcessingTimeTrigger.clear(ContinuousProcessingTimeTrigger.java:91)
> at
> org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.operators.windowing.WindowOperator$Context.clear(WindowOperator.java:768)
> at
> org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.operators.windowing.WindowOperator$2.merge(WindowOperator.java:310)
> at
> org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.operators.windowing.WindowOperator$2.merge(WindowOperator.java:297)
> at
> org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.operators.windowing.MergingWindowSet.addWindow(MergingWindowSet.java:196)
> at
> org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.operators.windowing.WindowOperator.processElement(WindowOperator.java:297)
> at
> org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.io.StreamInputProcessor.processInput(StreamInputProcessor.java:183)
> at
> org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.OneInputStreamTask.run(OneInputStreamTask.java:66)
> at
> org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.invoke(StreamTask.java:271)
> at org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task.run(Task.java:609)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> *how to reproduce ?*
> use ContinuousProcessingTimeTrigger instead of the default EventTimeTrigger
> in SessionWindowing example.
> *what's the cause ?*
> When two session windows are being merged, the states of the two
> ContinuousProcessingTimeTrigger are merged as well and the new namespace is
> the merged window. Later when the context tries to delete Timer from the old
> trigger and looks up the timestamp by the old namespace, null value is
> returned.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13465: [FLINK-18906][task] Support checkpointing with multiple input operator chained with sources
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13465: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13465#issuecomment-697427722 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit c3276e0e9b8c435529255acc155a3c3236418330 (Fri Feb 19 07:26:39 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #12157: [FLINK-17691][Connectors/Kafka] fix the bug FlinkKafkaProducer011 transactional.id too long when use Semantic.EXACTLY_ONCE mode
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #12157: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/12157#issuecomment-628725851 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 45572c3aec3b7ea7664c53e2a9b17cff2912ba24 (Fri Feb 19 07:26:31 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #12754: [FLINK-5717][streaming] Fix NPE on SessionWindows with ContinuousProc…
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #12754: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/12754#issuecomment-648062078 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 7d083b1c3bbbf2c621892c7396c854340bd3ee1e (Fri Feb 19 07:26:47 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13234: [FLINK-18905][task] Allow SourceOperator chaining with MultipleInputStreamTask
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13234: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13234#issuecomment-679234288 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit f1608e8ff1cc00fb6cf162f1320305d5f458d64b (Fri Feb 19 07:26:35 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13469: [FLINK-19361][hive] Create a synchronized metastore client to talk to…
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13469: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13469#issuecomment-698100897 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit aa119de40b44922ec6e7e2a201f098828ad4995e (Fri Feb 19 07:26:16 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13443: [FLINK-19288] Make the InternalTimeServiceManager an interface
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13443: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13443#issuecomment-69625 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 476e5afa594e9eb446ea6f78fa181e9433124137 (Fri Feb 19 07:26:27 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13454: [FLINK-19304][coordination] Add FLIP-138 feature toggle
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #13454: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13454#issuecomment-696661067 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 02e735e189e50372a90c0a06710546b12f2557b1 (Fri Feb 19 07:26:23 UTC 2021) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
