Github user markus-h commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/570#issuecomment-214833775
Sorry for not driving this further. I think this pull request is now way
too outdated to have any chance of rebasing it to the current master, therefore
I will close
Github user markus-h closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/570
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user markus-h closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/598
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user markus-h commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/598#issuecomment-93987347
There is no specific usecase, but when you try to process big graphs
locally you often run out of memory with delta iterations.
But the reason I needed this change
Github user markus-h commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/598#issuecomment-94008273
Hi @vasia,
thanks for your comments! I thought about this extension in a different
way. Whenever you have a graph that is too big to process it with delta
iteration
GitHub user markus-h opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/598
[FLINK-1885] [gelly] Added bulk execution mode to gellys vertex centric
iterations
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1885
I essentially exchanged the delta iteration
Github user markus-h commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/570#issuecomment-90694363
There seems to be a race condition somewhere in my code but I have trouble
finding it since I can not reproduce it locally. I thought my last change would
fix
Github user markus-h commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/570#issuecomment-89849730
Thanks for your comments!
I will try to revert my formattings. I am used to doing STRG+F while
programming that probably changed the formatting.
I also got
Github user markus-h commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/36#issuecomment-89529411
This change is continued in https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/570
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user markus-h closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/36
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user markus-h opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/570
[FLINK-951] Reworking of Iteration Synchronization, Accumulators and
Aggregators
Iteration synchronization through JobManager
Unification of Accumulators and Aggregators (removal of former
Github user markus-h commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/36#issuecomment-88924335
I continued working on this. I will try to integrate this change in the
current master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
12 matches
Mail list logo
