[GitHub] [flink] maosuhan commented on pull request #21613: [FLINK-30093][formats] Fix compile errors for google.protobuf.Timestamp type

2023-01-09 Thread GitBox
maosuhan commented on PR #21613: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/21613#issuecomment-1376836273 @laughingman7743 It looks all right now. @libenchao Do you have time to take another look at this? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

[GitHub] [flink] maosuhan commented on pull request #21613: [FLINK-30093][formats] Fix compile errors for google.protobuf.Timestamp type

2023-01-08 Thread GitBox
maosuhan commented on PR #21613: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/21613#issuecomment-1375027529 @laughingman7743 The code LGTM. Would you also add documentation in protobuf page describing how to use timestamp type or other internal provided type? Some users may not know the

[GitHub] [flink] maosuhan commented on pull request #21613: [FLINK-30093][formats] Fix compile errors for google.protobuf.Timestamp type

2023-01-08 Thread GitBox
maosuhan commented on PR #21613: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/21613#issuecomment-1374837459 @laughingman7743 Thanks for your quick quick fix. We are almost there. Would you add another unit test like TimestampMultiRowToProto.java to make sure flink row can be correctly