darenwkt opened a new pull request, #620:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/620

   <!--
   *Thank you very much for contributing to the Apache Flink Kubernetes 
Operator - we are happy that you want to help us improve the project. To help 
the community review your contribution in the best possible way, please go 
through the checklist below, which will get the contribution into a shape in 
which it can be best reviewed.*
   
   ## Contribution Checklist
   
     - Make sure that the pull request corresponds to a [JIRA 
issue](https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FLINK/issues). Exceptions are 
made for typos in JavaDoc or documentation files, which need no JIRA issue.
     
     - Name the pull request in the form "[FLINK-XXXX] [component] Title of the 
pull request", where *FLINK-XXXX* should be replaced by the actual issue 
number. Skip *component* if you are unsure about which is the best component.
     Typo fixes that have no associated JIRA issue should be named following 
this pattern: `[hotfix][docs] Fix typo in event time introduction` or 
`[hotfix][javadocs] Expand JavaDoc for PuncuatedWatermarkGenerator`.
   
     - Fill out the template below to describe the changes contributed by the 
pull request. That will give reviewers the context they need to do the review.
     
     - Make sure that the change passes the automated tests, i.e., `mvn clean 
verify` passes. You can read more on how we use GitHub Actions for CI 
[here](https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-docs-main/docs/development/guide/#cicd).
   
     - Each pull request should address only one issue, not mix up code from 
multiple issues.
     
     - Each commit in the pull request has a meaningful commit message 
(including the JIRA id)
   
     - Once all items of the checklist are addressed, remove the above text and 
this checklist, leaving only the filled out template below.
   
   
   **(The sections below can be removed for hotfixes of typos)**
   -->
   
   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   
   
   CR Error field is improved in 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29708.
   
   The error field is more structured with exception type, stackTrace, 
additionalMetadata, etc.
   
    
   
   This ticket is a proposal to expose a config 
("kubernetes.operator.exception.metadata.mapper") to enrich the 
additionalMetadata further.
   
    
   
   The config consists of key-value pairs, for example:
   
   ```
   kubernetes.operator.exception.metadata.mapper: IOException:Found 
IOException,403:Found 403 error code
   ```
   
   The key is a REGEX string that will be used to match against the whole stack 
trace and if found, the value will be added to additionalMetadata. For example:
   
   ```
   apiVersion: flink.apache.org/v1beta1
   kind: FlinkSessionJob
   ....
     name: basic-session-job-example
     namespace: default
     resourceVersion: "70206149"
     uid: 916ea8f5-0821-4839-9953-2db9678c3fc9
   spec:
     deploymentName: basic-session-deployment-example
     job:
       args: []
       jarURI: https://test-s3.s3.amazonaws.com/doubleExecute.jar
       parallelism: 4
       state: running
       upgradeMode: stateless
   status:
     error: 
'{"type":"org.apache.flink.kubernetes.operator.exception.ReconciliationException","message":"java.io.IOException:
       Server returned HTTP response code: 403 for URL: 
https://test-s3.s3.amazonaws.com/doubleExecute.jar","additionalMetadata":{"exceptionMapper":["Found
       403 error code","Found 
IOException"]},"throwableList":[{"type":"java.io.IOException","message":"Server
       returned HTTP response code: 403 for URL: 
https://test-s3.s3.amazonaws.com/doubleExecute.jar","additionalMetadata":{"exceptionMapper":["Found
       403 error code"]}}]}'
   ...
   ```
    
   
   
   
   ## Brief change log
   
   - Added new operator config for user to specify REGEX to extract info from 
exception and enrich CR error field with it.
   
   ## Verifying this change
   <!--
   Please make sure both new and modified tests in this PR follows the 
conventions defined in our code quality guide: 
https://flink.apache.org/contributing/code-style-and-quality-common.html#testing
   -->
   - Added unit test
   - Sanity test by building image and testing in minikube
   
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
     - The public API, i.e., is any changes to the `CustomResourceDescriptors`: 
(no)
     - Core observer or reconciler logic that is regularly executed: (no)
   
   ## Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes)
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? (docs)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to