Github user gaborhermann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1849
Great. I agree this PR should be merged before #2838.
@skonto thanks for taking up the review :) This is indeed a bit blocking.
Hopefully I can improve upon #2838 next week, so by the
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1849
Hi guys, my intention was to review #2838 but my feeling is that it
overlaps with this one. @thvasilo we can push this one first as you said so I
will have a look at it and comment on it. The benefit
Github user thvasilo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1849
Hello @gaborhermann. Personally I prefer to have PRs be as specific as
possible, so I would recommend we try to get this merged before #2838, and then
rebase that on master.
Given the
Github user gaborhermann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1849
Hi @skonto, I did not have time lately to finish up #2838, but I could
clean it up next week. Although I believe this PR could be merged separately
from mine. (Evaluating ranking
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1849
@thvasilo thnx I will have a look
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user thvasilo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1849
Hello @skonto this PR will probably be subsumed by #2838, you can check out
the latest development there.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1849
Hey @thvasilo is this under development? From what I see many other tasks
depend on it right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user thvasilo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1849
@gaborhermann In terms of missing features, documentation is definitely
missing, as @rawkintrevo mentioned.
For the issues mentioned in the JIRA issue you linked I've replied on the
dev
Github user gaborhermann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1849
Hi all,
What is the status of this PR?
It would be relevant for us, because we might like to use the evaluation
framework proposed here. See