[GitHub] flink issue #2472: [FLINK-4361] Introduce Flink's own future abstraction
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2472 Thanks for the review @KurtYoung, @mxm and @StephanEwen. I will merge this PR to the flip-6 branch. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] flink issue #2472: [FLINK-4361] Introduce Flink's own future abstraction
Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2472 The naming is not super nice, I agree. But there is a clear benefit for Java 8 familiar people to stick with something established. +1 for this from my side. Next time we get involved in the Java community processes, to make sure they have better names ;-) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] flink issue #2472: [FLINK-4361] Introduce Flink's own future abstraction
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2472 Thanks for your review @KurtYoung. Will address your comments. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
