Github user fhueske commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2508
Thanks, merging then
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2508
I think you are right.
+1 to merge then
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user fhueske commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2508
Adding a NoOp would prevent the unions from being merged, but the output of
the NoOp would still need to be replicated because it needs to be served to two
different operators.
if you have
Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2508
Another possibility would be to simply add a `NoOp` operator behind a union
with multiple outputs with different partitioning schemes. That prevents the
unions from being merged.
Would
