Github user StephenWithPH commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2633
@zentol & @StephanEwen ... anything I can do to get this ready to merge?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zentol commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2633
@StephanEwen I integrated all of your suggestions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2633
Look pretty good.
I think it would be good to try to make the Cassandra Module to the user
Scala independent. That way, we don't introduce a hard requirement for Scala
versioning and mak
Github user eliaslevy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2633
ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user zentol commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2633
The important class is `CassandraScalaProductSink` which extracts the
fields from the scala classes. Apart from that it behaves exactly like the
`CassandraTupleSink`. As a result of that this common b
