Github user rmetzger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4017
That would be nice, yes. Thx
Sent from my iPhone
> On 23. Jun 2017, at 11:52, zentol wrote:
>
> I could include this in my merge PR #4124 if you want @rmetzger
>
>
Github user zentol commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4017
I could include this in my merge PR
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4124 if you want @rmetzger
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user rmetzger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4017
With the current travis situation, I can not validate this branch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user rmetzger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4017
Change looks good.
I'll merge it once travis gives green light on my fork.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
