Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/478
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/478#issuecomment-78308404
Thanks for the fix!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/478#issuecomment-78226428
Curious why this works.
We should merge this pull request anyways, because it shows the recommended
way to do things.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user chiwanpark commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/478#issuecomment-78228121
As I wrote in JIRA, Fields of Scala class (not case class) are private.
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/478#issuecomment-78229903
Then I guess that the Scala API does not identify the ```WordWithCount```
as a POJO but as something different.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/478#issuecomment-78230090
Maybe it is treated as a ```GenericType```
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user chiwanpark opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/478
[FLINK-1654] Wrong scala example of POJO type in documentation
More detail description and discussion in
[JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1654).
You can merge this pull request
