Github user vasia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/547#issuecomment-91048962
Thanks so much for the review @fhueske, @StephanEwen!
I'll make the suggested changes and merge :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/547#issuecomment-90883704
I like the change as well! Good to go!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/547#discussion_r27955651
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-gelly/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/graph/Graph.java ---
@@ -1118,30 +1119,52 @@ public boolean filter(EdgeK, EV edge) {
Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/547#discussion_r27955499
--- Diff: docs/gelly_guide.md ---
@@ -343,29 +343,86 @@ Vertex-centric Iterations
Gelly wraps Flink's [Spargel API](spargel_guide.html) to provide methods
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/547#issuecomment-90863498
LGTM
I browsed the diffs and didn't find anything crucial. Just a typo and one
possible simplification.
The change makes vertex iterations much easier to use
Github user vasia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/547#issuecomment-90745094
Hi,
any opinions on this?
I would like to merge it soon because it changes the api and vertex-centric
related issues depend on it.
Thanks!
---
If your project
