Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1514
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user vasia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1514#issuecomment-178453684
Cool, I'll rebase and merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1514#issuecomment-177612285
+1 to this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1514#issuecomment-176838607
Are there any objections to merging this? I think the arguments on mailing
list/jira sounded reasonable and you probably know this part of Flink best,
@vasia.
---
If
GitHub user vasia opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1514
[FLINK-3208] [gelly] rename vertex-centric iteration model to scatter-gather
This is the first step to introducing a Pregel abstraction in Gelly.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
