Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3943
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user twalthr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3943#discussion_r117928792
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/table/api/scala/stream/table/validation/GroupWindowAggregationsTest.scala
---
@@
Github user twalthr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3943#discussion_r117929380
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/table/utils/TableTestBase.scala
---
@@ -120,7 +125,8 @@ object TableTestUtil {
}
Github user twalthr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3943#discussion_r117929561
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/table/api/scala/stream/table/stringexpr/UnionStringExpressionTest.scala
---
@@ -0,0
GitHub user sunjincheng121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3943
[FLINK-6617][table] Improve JAVA and SCALA logical plans consistent test
In this PR. I had make some changes as follows:
1. Add all the tableAPI AVA and SCALA logical plans consistent
