Re: [PR] [hotfix] Correct the option key for sortPartition's java doc [flink]

2024-04-07 Thread via GitHub


reswqa merged PR #24627:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/24627


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] [hotfix] Correct the option key for sortPartition's java doc [flink]

2024-04-06 Thread via GitHub


flinkbot commented on PR #24627:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/24627#issuecomment-2041291845

   
   ## CI report:
   
   * 7435124358660a306a82811a6a94a0799cbddcab UNKNOWN
   
   
   Bot commands
 The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
   
- `@flinkbot run azure` re-run the last Azure build
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[PR] [hotfix] Correct the option key for sortPartition's java doc [flink]

2024-04-06 Thread via GitHub


reswqa opened a new pull request, #24627:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/24627

   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   *Correct the option key for sortPartition's java doc*
   
   
   ## Brief change log
   
 - *Correct the option key for sortPartition's java doc.*
 - *Document the field start from 1 for sortPartition*
   
   
   ## Verifying this change
   
   This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
   
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
 - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): no
 - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with 
`@Public(Evolving)`: no
 - The serializers: no
 - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): no
 - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its 
components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: no
 - The S3 file system connector: no
   
   ## Documentation
   
 - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org