[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-23313) Reintroduce temporal table function documentation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17422407#comment-17422407
]
Seth Wiesman commented on FLINK-23313:
--
resolved in release-1.14: fc8e269e9415a75fe9d1c5634eef2caaf059e1bc
master: a328e3b2a264a914d9fef4a94f91eecc6623a08c
> Reintroduce temporal table function documentation
> -
>
> Key: FLINK-23313
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23313
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Documentation, Table SQL / API
>Reporter: Timo Walther
>Assignee: Leonard Xu
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> FLIP-132 introduced the new {{FOR SYSTEM_TIME AS OF}} and dropped the main
> documentation for temporal table function. This causes a lot of confusion for
> users.
> First, because processing time joins are not supported yet.
> Second, because a primary key might not always be present in the current
> pipeline when using Table API.
> We have not deprecated `createTemporalTableFunction` and the documentation in
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.13/docs/dev/table/tableapi/#join-with-temporal-table
> is not enough.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-23313) Reintroduce temporal table function documentation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17411906#comment-17411906
]
Leonard Xu commented on FLINK-23313:
[~MartijnVisser] Sure, please assign this to me.
> Reintroduce temporal table function documentation
> -
>
> Key: FLINK-23313
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23313
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Documentation, Table SQL / API
>Reporter: Timo Walther
>Priority: Critical
>
> FLIP-132 introduced the new {{FOR SYSTEM_TIME AS OF}} and dropped the main
> documentation for temporal table function. This causes a lot of confusion for
> users.
> First, because processing time joins are not supported yet.
> Second, because a primary key might not always be present in the current
> pipeline when using Table API.
> We have not deprecated `createTemporalTableFunction` and the documentation in
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.13/docs/dev/table/tableapi/#join-with-temporal-table
> is not enough.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-23313) Reintroduce temporal table function documentation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17411896#comment-17411896
]
Martijn Visser commented on FLINK-23313:
[~Leonard Xu] Should I still assign this ticket to you?
> Reintroduce temporal table function documentation
> -
>
> Key: FLINK-23313
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23313
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Documentation, Table SQL / API
>Reporter: Timo Walther
>Priority: Critical
>
> FLIP-132 introduced the new {{FOR SYSTEM_TIME AS OF}} and dropped the main
> documentation for temporal table function. This causes a lot of confusion for
> users.
> First, because processing time joins are not supported yet.
> Second, because a primary key might not always be present in the current
> pipeline when using Table API.
> We have not deprecated `createTemporalTableFunction` and the documentation in
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.13/docs/dev/table/tableapi/#join-with-temporal-table
> is not enough.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-23313) Reintroduce temporal table function documentation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17377347#comment-17377347
]
Leonard Xu commented on FLINK-23313:
Thanks [~twalthr] for open this ticket, I keep the temporal table function in
FLINK-19082, but the documentation lost latter. I agree that we should
reIntroduce it until we support processing time temporal join.
Could you assign this ticket to me ?
> Reintroduce temporal table function documentation
> -
>
> Key: FLINK-23313
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23313
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Documentation, Table SQL / API
>Reporter: Timo Walther
>Priority: Critical
>
> FLIP-132 introduced the new {{FOR SYSTEM_TIME AS OF}} and dropped the main
> documentation for temporal table function. This causes a lot of confusion for
> users.
> First, because processing time joins are not supported yet.
> Second, because a primary key might not always be present in the current
> pipeline when using Table API.
> We have not deprecated `createTemporalTableFunction` and the documentation in
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.13/docs/dev/table/tableapi/#join-with-temporal-table
> is not enough.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-23313) Reintroduce temporal table function documentation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17377337#comment-17377337
]
Timo Walther commented on FLINK-23313:
--
CC [~Leonard Xu]
> Reintroduce temporal table function documentation
> -
>
> Key: FLINK-23313
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23313
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Documentation, Table SQL / API
>Reporter: Timo Walther
>Priority: Critical
>
> FLIP-132 introduced the new {{FOR SYSTEM_TIME AS OF}} and dropped the main
> documentation for temporal table function. This causes a lot of confusion for
> users.
> First, because processing time joins are not supported yet.
> Second, because a primary key might not always be present in the current
> pipeline when using Table API.
> We have not deprecated `createTemporalTableFunction` and the documentation in
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.13/docs/dev/table/tableapi/#join-with-temporal-table
> is not enough.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
