[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-28045) [umbrella] Deprecate SourceFunction API
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17747334#comment-17747334 ] Konstantin Knauf commented on FLINK-28045: -- [~airblader] What we still need to do, though, is actually aligning on the list of these issues/blockers. > [umbrella] Deprecate SourceFunction API > --- > > Key: FLINK-28045 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28045 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Technical Debt > Components: Connectors / Common >Reporter: Alexander Fedulov >Assignee: Alexander Fedulov >Priority: Major > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-28045) [umbrella] Deprecate SourceFunction API
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17556393#comment-17556393 ] Alexander Fedulov commented on FLINK-28045: --- Good idea, [~airblader] . I will add it to the deprecation PR that will follow as soon as the vote gets closed. > [umbrella] Deprecate SourceFunction API > --- > > Key: FLINK-28045 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28045 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Technical Debt > Components: Connectors / Common >Reporter: Alexander Fedulov >Priority: Major > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.7#820007)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-28045) [umbrella] Deprecate SourceFunction API
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17556319#comment-17556319 ] Ingo Bürk commented on FLINK-28045: --- What I'd like to see, personally, is a note on the deprecated API that guarantees that the (now deprecated) APIs will not be removed until these issues are resolved. Otherwise IMO it could easily happen in the future that 2.0 is released, deprecated APIs are removed in a cleanup process thereof, but no one actually remembers that these issues here must first be implemented. Basically, all of these issues are blockers for 2.0 if SourceFunction is to be dropped with 2.0. > [umbrella] Deprecate SourceFunction API > --- > > Key: FLINK-28045 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28045 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Technical Debt > Components: Connectors / Common >Reporter: Alexander Fedulov >Priority: Major > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.7#820007)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-28045) [umbrella] Deprecate SourceFunction API
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1769#comment-1769 ] Alexander Fedulov commented on FLINK-28045: --- [~knaufk] Specified in the [VOTE] thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/kv9rj3w2rmkb8jtss5bqffhw57or7v8v > [umbrella] Deprecate SourceFunction API > --- > > Key: FLINK-28045 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28045 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Technical Debt > Components: Connectors / Common >Reporter: Alexander Fedulov >Priority: Major > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.7#820007)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-28045) [umbrella] Deprecate SourceFunction API
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1761#comment-1761 ] Konstantin Knauf commented on FLINK-28045: -- Are all of these subtasks considered blockers for the deprecation or is there a distincation between "Must Have" and "Nice-to-Have"? > [umbrella] Deprecate SourceFunction API > --- > > Key: FLINK-28045 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28045 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Technical Debt > Components: Connectors / Common >Reporter: Alexander Fedulov >Priority: Major > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.7#820007)
