[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Fabian Hueske resolved FLINK-1419.
----------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 0.8.1
                   0.9

Fixed in 563e546236217dace58a8031d56d08a27e08160b

> DistributedCache doesn't preserver files for subsequent operations
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-1419
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1419
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.8, 0.9
>            Reporter: Chesnay Schepler
>            Assignee: Chesnay Schepler
>             Fix For: 0.9, 0.8.1
>
>
> When subsequent operations want to access the same files in the DC it 
> frequently happens that the files are not created for the following operation.
> This is fairly odd, since the DC is supposed to either a) preserve files when 
> another operation kicks in within a certain time window, or b) just recreate 
> the deleted files. Both things don't happen.
> Increasing the time window had no effect.
> I'd like to use this issue as a starting point for a more general discussion 
> about the DistributedCache. 
> Currently:
> 1. all files reside in a common job-specific directory
> 2. are deleted during the job.
>  
> One thing that was brought up about Trait 1 is that it basically forbids 
> modification of the files, concurrent access and all. Personally I'm not sure 
> if this a problem. Changing it to a task-specific place solved the issue 
> though.
> I'm more concerned about Trait #2. Besides the mentioned issue, the deletion 
> is realized with the scheduler, which adds a lot of complexity to the current 
> code. (It really is a pain to work on...) 
> If we moved the deletion to the end of the job it could be done as a clean-up 
> step in the TaskManager, With this we could reduce the DC to a 
> cacheFile(String source) method, the delete method in the TM, and throw out 
> everything else.
> Also, the current implementation implies that big files may be copied 
> multiple times. This may be undesired, depending on how big the files are.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to