Jens Deppe created GEODE-4129: --------------------------------- Summary: gfsh list members command feels inconsistent Key: GEODE-4129 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-4129 Project: Geode Issue Type: Bug Components: gfsh Reporter: Jens Deppe
{{list members}} now also shows the 'coordinator': {noformat} gfsh>list members Name | Id ------------ | ------------------------------------------------ Coordinator: | 10.118.19.26(locator1:7903:locator)<ec><v0>:1024 locator1 | 10.118.19.26(locator1:7903:locator)<ec><v0>:1024 server1 | 10.118.19.26(server1:7933)<v1>:1025 server2 | 10.118.19.26(server2:8075)<v2>:1026 {noformat} This just looks untidy. Here {{server-2}} is part of a group: {noformat} gfsh>list members --group=group1 Name | Id ------------ | ------------------------------------------------ Coordinator: | 10.118.19.26(locator1:7903:locator)<ec><v0>:1024 server2 | 10.118.19.26(server2:8075)<v2>:1026 {noformat} But the 'coordinator' is not part of that group. Again, inconsistent and untidy. I would prefer the relevant member to be highlight somehow as a coordinator. For example: {noformat} gfsh>list members Name | Id ------------ | ------------------------------------------------ locator1 | 10.118.19.26(locator1:7903:locator)<ec><v0>:1024 [coordinator] server1 | 10.118.19.26(server1:7933)<v1>:1025 server2 | 10.118.19.26(server2:8075)<v2>:1026 {noformat} Or perhaps better yet would be to introduce a separate {{list coordinator}} command. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)