[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14822) Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15014102#comment-15014102 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14822: --- [~samarthjain] and took a look. It turns out that Phoenix

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14822) Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14822: -- Attachment: (was: 14822-0.98-v4.txt) > Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14822) Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14822: -- Attachment: (was: 14822-0.98-v3.txt) > Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14822) Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15015331#comment-15015331 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14822: --- Waiting for a test run. > Renewing leases of scanners

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14822) Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14822: -- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14822) Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14822: -- Attachment: 14822-v3-0.98.txt Naming patch so that HadoopQA recognizes it as 0.98 (I think it

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14822) Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14822: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14822) Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15011955#comment-15011955 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14822: --- Thanks [~samarthjain]. Good point. Although I think we

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14822) Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15012069#comment-15012069 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14822: --- Looking again, the {{!moreResults}} is only set to false

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14822) Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15012050#comment-15012050 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14822: --- So originally I put this in because I thought this can

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14791) Batch Deletes in MapReduce jobs (0.98)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15009826#comment-15009826 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14791: --- +1, thanks [~alexaraujo] Going to commit now. > Batch

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14822) Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15009839#comment-15009839 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14822: --- Shame on me for not adding a test to HBASE-1. Looking.

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14791) Batch Deletes in MapReduce jobs (0.98)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14791: -- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Status: Resolved (was: Patch

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14822) Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14822: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14791) Batch Deletes in MapReduce jobs (0.98)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15009987#comment-15009987 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14791: --- I do not see any java doc warnings pertaining to the files

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14822) Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14822: -- Attachment: 14822-0.98.txt Here's a patch for 0.98 with test that actually tests that the

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14822) Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14822: -- Fix Version/s: 1.0.4 1.1.3 1.3.0 1.2.0

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14822) Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14822: -- Fix Version/s: 0.98.17 > Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14822) Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15010320#comment-15010320 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14822: --- bq. Would it work to use EnvironmentEdgeManager#injectEdge

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14822) Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15010347#comment-15010347 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14822: --- Looked. The lease times out in wall time unfortunately.

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14822) Renewing leases of scanners doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14822: -- Attachment: 14822-0.98-v2.txt * fixed license header * using 1/2 the default leas timeout now.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14791) [0.98] CopyTable is extremely slow when moving delete markers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15003336#comment-15003336 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14791: --- Looks good! Two questions: # Would subclassing (as

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-14791) [0.98] CopyTable is extremely slow when moving delete markers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15003336#comment-15003336 ] Lars Hofhansl edited comment on HBASE-14791 at 11/13/15 1:42 AM: - Looks

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14221) Reduce the number of time row comparison is done in a Scan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15003338#comment-15003338 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14221: --- The LoserTree did not work out in all cases, but in

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-14791) [0.98] CopyTable is extremely slow when moving delete markers

Lars Hofhansl created HBASE-14791: - Summary: [0.98] CopyTable is extremely slow when moving delete markers Key: HBASE-14791 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14791 Project: HBase

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14791) [0.98] CopyTable is extremely slow when moving delete markers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14999064#comment-14999064 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14791: --- Cool! > [0.98] CopyTable is extremely slow when moving

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14791) [0.98] CopyTable is extremely slow when moving delete markers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14791: -- Description: We found that some of our copy table job run for many hours, even when there

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14791) [0.98] CopyTable is extremely slow when moving delete markers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1443#comment-1443 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14791: --- One tricky aspect of this is that we generally want to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14511) StoreFile.Writer Meta Plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14995798#comment-14995798 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14511: --- This is mostly good to go, no? I like how you avoided the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-13082) Coarsen StoreScanner locks to RegionScanner

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14991667#comment-14991667 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-13082: --- bq. The volatile check is still a memory fence barrier

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14511) StoreFile.Writer Meta Plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14977791#comment-14977791 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14511: --- I can also see a new filter API: As an optional

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-13318) RpcServer.getListenerAddress should handle when the accept channel is closed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14973013#comment-14973013 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-13318: --- Looks good (although I admit I find it hard convince

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14657) Remove unneeded API from EncodedSeeker

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14972387#comment-14972387 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14657: --- Cool... I was gonna do it. Just need to wait long enough

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14613) Remove MemStoreChunkPool?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14972390#comment-14972390 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14613: --- Hmm... Nothing in this thread represented a convincing

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14628) [0.98] Save object creation for scanning with block encodings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14965745#comment-14965745 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14628: --- And agreed on removing getValueShallowCopy. Return a

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14628) [0.98] Save object creation for scanning with block encodings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14628: -- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Status: Resolved (was: Patch

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14463) Severe performance downgrade when parallel reading a single key from BucketCache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14965840#comment-14965840 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14463: --- Bit late to the party. We do have the IdLock in order to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14628) [0.98] Save object creation for scanning with block encodings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14965720#comment-14965720 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14628: --- Filed sub task (HBASE-14657) to remove the API from

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-14657) Remove unneeded API from EncodedSeeker

Lars Hofhansl created HBASE-14657: - Summary: Remove unneeded API from EncodedSeeker Key: HBASE-14657 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14657 Project: HBase Issue Type:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14463) Severe performance downgrade when parallel reading a single key from BucketCache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14965843#comment-14965843 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14463: --- Never mind. Looked at the patch again - should have taken

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14628) [0.98] Save object creation for scanning with block encodings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14965890#comment-14965890 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14628: --- [~giacomotaylor], FYI. Shaves another 5-10% of many

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14463) Severe performance downgrade when parallel reading a single key from BucketCache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14965848#comment-14965848 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14463: --- Curious: What's the penalty of not having the lockPool?

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14628) [0.98] Save object creation for scanning with block encodings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14964499#comment-14964499 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14628: --- Tested the perf improvement again. Found it to be between

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14628) Save object creation for scanning with block encodings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14962692#comment-14962692 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14628: --- Thanks will commit later tonight. > Save object creation

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14628) [0.98] Save object creation for scanning with block encodings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14628: -- Attachment: 14628-0.98-v2.txt Patch needed a fix to the EncodedSeeker interface as well (since

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14628) [0.98] Save object creation for scanning with block encodings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14628: -- Fix Version/s: 0.98.16 > [0.98] Save object creation for scanning with block encodings >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14628) [0.98] Save object creation for scanning with block encodings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14628: -- Summary: [0.98] Save object creation for scanning with block encodings (was: Save object

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14628) [0.98] Save object creation for scanning with block encodings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14628: -- Assignee: Lars Hofhansl Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > [0.98] Save object

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14628) [0.98] Save object creation for scanning with block encodings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14962844#comment-14962844 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14628: --- The DataBlockEncoder interface is marked private, so I

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14628) Save object creation for scanning with block encodings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14962162#comment-14962162 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14628: --- Yep, only useful in 0.98. Worth committing? 1.0 and later

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-14628) Save object creation for scanning with FAST_DIFF encoding

Lars Hofhansl created HBASE-14628: - Summary: Save object creation for scanning with FAST_DIFF encoding Key: HBASE-14628 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14628 Project: HBase

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14628) Save object creation for scanning with FAST_DIFF encoding

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14961732#comment-14961732 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14628: --- [~anoop.hbase] Master still creates a ByteBuffer on the

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14628) Save object creation for scanning with FAST_DIFF encoding

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14628: -- Attachment: 14628-0.98.txt Found the problem. Here's a 0.98 patch. The actual macro win is 5%

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14628) Save object creation for scanning with block encodings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14628: -- Summary: Save object creation for scanning with block encodings (was: Save object creation

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14613) Remove MemStoreChunkPool?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14958401#comment-14958401 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14613: --- More data is always good. :) I doubt it'll make a

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14613) Remove MemStoreChunkPool?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14960206#comment-14960206 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14613: --- I am always dubious about trying to be smarter than the

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14613) Remove MemStoreChunkPool?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14613: -- Attachment: 14613-0.98.txt Trivial patch. Simply remove the chunk pool and all its uses. Also

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-14613) Remove MemStoreChunkPool?

Lars Hofhansl created HBASE-14613: - Summary: Remove MemStoreChunkPool? Key: HBASE-14613 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14613 Project: HBase Issue Type: Brainstorming

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14283) Reverse scan doesn’t work with HFile inline index/bloom blocks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14956254#comment-14956254 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14283: --- Am I understanding correctly that we already incur two

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-14283) Reverse scan doesn’t work with HFile inline index/bloom blocks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14956254#comment-14956254 ] Lars Hofhansl edited comment on HBASE-14283 at 10/14/15 4:45 AM: - Am I

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-14221) Reduce the number of time row comparison is done in a Scan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14956224#comment-14956224 ] Lars Hofhansl edited comment on HBASE-14221 at 10/14/15 4:18 AM: - I think

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14221) Reduce the number of time row comparison is done in a Scan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14956224#comment-14956224 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14221: --- I think [~mcorgan] KeyValueScannerHeap is worth exploring

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14221) Reduce the number of time row comparison is done in a Scan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14954366#comment-14954366 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14221: --- Agreed... I do think the most compares happen in the heaps

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14221) Reduce the number of time row comparison is done in a Scan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14954370#comment-14954370 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14221: --- Might be time to look at HBASE-9969 again. > Reduce the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7755) Experiment with LAB in BlockEndcoding

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14952406#comment-14952406 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-7755: -- Just thought about this again. It's interesting that when I

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14549) Simplify scanner stack reset logic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14951645#comment-14951645 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14549: --- OK... I get it now. In KeyValueHeap we always have the top

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14221) Reduce the number of time row comparison is done in a Scan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14221: -- Attachment: 14221-0.98-takeALook.txt [~ram_krish], take a look at the "-takeALook" sample.

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-14221) Reduce the number of time row comparison is done in a Scan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14946327#comment-14946327 ] Lars Hofhansl edited comment on HBASE-14221 at 10/7/15 6:08 AM:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14221) Reduce the number of time row comparison is done in a Scan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14948057#comment-14948057 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14221: --- I should make my patch compile fully. :) The compare in

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14549) Simplify scanner stack reset logic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14946279#comment-14946279 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14549: --- Looking more at HBASE-5121, I think I do not understand

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9260) Timestamp Compactions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14946284#comment-14946284 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-9260: -- Sounds very similar to me. > Timestamp Compactions >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14221) Reduce the number of time row comparison is done in a Scan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14946298#comment-14946298 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14221: --- Good find. Although, isn't there a simpler way to do

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14549) Simplify scanner stack reset logic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14942825#comment-14942825 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14549: --- There is a slight performance improvement too. > Simplify

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14549) Simplify scanner stack reset logic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14942865#comment-14942865 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14549: --- Hmm... Yes, not quite right, although I do not understand

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14549) Simplify scanner stack reset logic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14942867#comment-14942867 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14549: --- See HBASE-5121 (and my _own_ suggestion to simplify fix

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14549) Simplify scanner stack reset logic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14942876#comment-14942876 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14549: --- Thanks for keeping me honest [~stack] :) > Simplify

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14549) Simplify scanner stack reset logic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14942862#comment-14942862 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14549: --- TestScanner looks very relevant. Looking., > Simplify

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14549) Simplify scanner stack reset logic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14942557#comment-14942557 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14549: --- TestAtomicOperation passes multiple runs (it mixes flushes

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14549) Simplify scanner stack reset logic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14549: -- Attachment: 14549-0.98.txt Patch for 0.98. Simply does away with checkReseek and the

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-14549) Simplify scanner stack reset logic

Lars Hofhansl created HBASE-14549: - Summary: Simplify scanner stack reset logic Key: HBASE-14549 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14549 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14549) Simplify scanner stack reset logic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14549: -- Description: Looking at the code, I find that the logic is unnecessarily complex. We indicate

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14539) Slight improvement of StoreScanner.optimize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14539: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.98.12) (was: 1.1.0)

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-14539) Slight improvement of StoreScanner.optimize

Lars Hofhansl created HBASE-14539: - Summary: Slight improvement of StoreScanner.optimize Key: HBASE-14539 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14539 Project: HBase Issue Type:

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14539) Slight improvement of StoreScanner.optimize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-14539: -- Attachment: 14539-0.98.txt Here's a trivial patch. Makes absolutely sure we do no work (other

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-14509) Configurable sparse indexes?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14935818#comment-14935818 ] Lars Hofhansl edited comment on HBASE-14509 at 10/2/15 6:16 AM:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14511) StoreFile.Writer Meta Plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14940808#comment-14940808 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14511: --- I'd like to use this for Phoenix to store min/max for some

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14509) Configurable sparse indexes?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14942101#comment-14942101 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14509: --- The other part that's needed is to actually make use of

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14539) Slight improvement of StoreScanner.optimize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14942077#comment-14942077 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14539: --- I'll commit everywhere now. > Slight improvement of

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-14539) Slight improvement of StoreScanner.optimize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl resolved HBASE-14539. --- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Committed to 0.98.x, 1.0.x, 1.1.x, 1.2.x,

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14468) Compaction improvements: FIFO compaction policy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14940769#comment-14940769 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14468: --- HBASE-14677 doesn't exist, though :) > Compaction

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14468) Compaction improvements: FIFO compaction policy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14939307#comment-14939307 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14468: --- The other thing I want to do is tired compactions along

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9260) Timestamp Compactions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14939311#comment-14939311 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-9260: -- Warming this up again. I called this time-tired compactions

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-13082) Coarsen StoreScanner locks to RegionScanner

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14934759#comment-14934759 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-13082: --- Feel free [~ram_krish]. I just happened to look at the

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-14509) Configurable sparse indexes?

Lars Hofhansl created HBASE-14509: - Summary: Configurable sparse indexes? Key: HBASE-14509 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14509 Project: HBase Issue Type: Brainstorming

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14468) Compaction improvements: FIFO compaction policy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14934776#comment-14934776 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14468: --- Haven't looked at the patch, but the idea sounds great!

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14468) Compaction improvements: FIFO compaction policy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14935830#comment-14935830 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14468: --- Thanks for background. We have some use cases with TTL,

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14509) Configurable sparse indexes?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14935826#comment-14935826 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14509: --- That's cool! Thanks [~vrodionov], I'll keep an eye on that

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14509) Configurable sparse indexes?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14936182#comment-14936182 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14509: --- Actually someone pointed out to me that one can use a BF

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14509) Configurable sparse indexes?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14935539#comment-14935539 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14509: --- Bloom filters are good for point lookups, not for range

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14489) postScannerFilterRow consumes a lot of CPU

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14909118#comment-14909118 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-14489: --- Great. Thanks. I'll commit some time tomorrow. >

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >