[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28436) Use connection url to specify the connection registry information

2024-05-15 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17846560#comment-17846560 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28436: - I just have a idea that maybe we can set a shorter default value for

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28436) Use connection url to specify the connection registry information

2024-03-31 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17832702#comment-17832702 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28436: - okok. It's just a thought. Let's focus on the prefix part right now.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28436) Use connection url to specify the connection registry information

2024-03-31 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17832696#comment-17832696 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28436: - Can we introduce name service in the URL like

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28399) region size can be wrong from RegionSizeCalculator

2024-02-28 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17821761#comment-17821761 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28399: - [~zhangduo] HBASE-26609 fixed the precision problem for storefiles.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28399) region size can be wrong from RegionSizeCalculator

2024-02-28 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17821756#comment-17821756 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28399: - [~ndimiduk] Yes, it is easy to miss data with

[jira] (HBASE-28399) region size can be wrong from RegionSizeCalculator

2024-02-27 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28399 ] ruanhui deleted comment on HBASE-28399: - was (Author: frostruan): HBASE-26609 may have solved this problem. A little strange Let me digger more > region size can be wrong from

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28399) region size can be wrong from RegionSizeCalculator

2024-02-27 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17821304#comment-17821304 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28399: - HBASE-26609 may have solved this problem. A little strange Let

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-28399) region size can be wrong from RegionSizeCalculator

2024-02-25 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ruanhui updated HBASE-28399: Priority: Major (was: Minor) > region size can be wrong from RegionSizeCalculator >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-28399) region size can be wrong from RegionSizeCalculator

2024-02-23 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ruanhui updated HBASE-28399: Description: The RegionSizeCalculator calculates region byte size using the following method {code:java}

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28399) region size can be wrong from RegionSizeCalculator

2024-02-23 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17820071#comment-17820071 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28399: - I left my comment in

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28399) region size can be wrong from RegionSizeCalculator

2024-02-23 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17819989#comment-17819989 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28399: - Another problem is that, the RegionSizeCalculator only considers the

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-28399) region size can be wrong from RegionSizeCalculator

2024-02-23 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-28399: --- Summary: region size can be wrong from RegionSizeCalculator Key: HBASE-28399 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28399 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28271) Infinite waiting on lock acquisition by snapshot can result in unresponsive master

2023-12-20 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17799241#comment-17799241 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28271: - Yes, you are right, in fact, setting 'hbase.snapshot.zk.coordinated'

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28271) Infinite waiting on lock acquisition by snapshot can result in unresponsive master

2023-12-19 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17798814#comment-17798814 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28271: - [~vjasani] Our users don't need to specify nonce group and nonce for

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28271) Infinite waiting on lock acquisition by snapshot can result in unresponsive master

2023-12-18 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17798460#comment-17798460 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28271: - For zk-based snapshot, maybe we can make the lock waiting time not

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28241) The snapshot operation encountered an NPE and failed.

2023-12-05 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17793278#comment-17793278 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28241: - (y)(y)(y) > The snapshot operation encountered an NPE and failed. >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28241) The snapshot operation encountered an NPE and failed.

2023-12-05 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17793245#comment-17793245 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28241: - Hi [~luoen] Thanks for the nice discovery.  If you don't mind, you

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28241) The snapshot operation encountered an NPE and failed.

2023-12-05 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17793243#comment-17793243 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28241: - I wrote an UT and reproduced the problem, here is the UT code:

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-28241) The snapshot operation encountered an NPE and failed.

2023-12-05 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17793127#comment-17793127 ] ruanhui edited comment on HBASE-28241 at 12/5/23 9:35 AM: -- In the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28241) The snapshot operation encountered an NPE and failed.

2023-12-05 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17793200#comment-17793200 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28241: - Agree.  And the FlushRegionProcedure have the same problem. If

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28241) The snapshot operation encountered an NPE and failed.

2023-12-04 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17793127#comment-17793127 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28241: - In the SnapshotManager, we have two methods {code:java} public

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28241) The snapshot operation encountered an NPE and failed.

2023-12-04 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17793109#comment-17793109 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28241: - I think this is because the SnapshotRegionProcedure doesn't hold lock

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28195) set start row as prefix if a scan with PrefixFilter

2023-11-10 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17784721#comment-17784721 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28195: - For string rowkey, the stop row also can be set as

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-28195) set start row as prefix if a scan with PrefixFilter

2023-11-09 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-28195: --- Summary: set start row as prefix if a scan with PrefixFilter Key: HBASE-28195 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28195 Project: HBase Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-28194) New Splittable Meta

2023-11-09 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-28194: --- Summary: New Splittable Meta Key: HBASE-28194 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28194 Project: HBase Issue Type: New Feature Components:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28139) Disable table may hang when SCP create TRSP but DTP didn't set tableState to disabling

2023-10-09 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17773535#comment-17773535 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28139: - oh. I get it. Please ignore my question. > Disable table may hang

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28139) Disable table may hang when SCP create TRSP but DTP didn't set tableState to disabling

2023-10-09 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17773533#comment-17773533 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28139: - Thanks for the quick reply [~saber_li]  So this is an improvement

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28139) Disable table may hang when SCP create TRSP but DTP didn't set tableState to disabling

2023-10-07 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17772833#comment-17772833 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28139: - hi [~saber_li]  is it possible to design an UT to reproduce the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28116) Move snapshot storage from filesystem to a separated HBase table

2023-09-27 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17769703#comment-17769703 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28116: - Hi Duo I write a simple doc to record some of my initial thoughts.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28116) Move snapshot storage from filesystem to a separated HBase table

2023-09-27 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17769634#comment-17769634 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28116: - Thanks for interesting in this and the quick reply [~zhangduo] 

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-28116) Move snapshot storage from filesystem to a separated HBase table

2023-09-27 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17769595#comment-17769595 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-28116: - Or maybe we can consider supporting storing snapshots on other file

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-28116) Move snapshot storage from filesystem to a separated HBase table

2023-09-27 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-28116: --- Summary: Move snapshot storage from filesystem to a separated HBase table Key: HBASE-28116 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28116 Project: HBase

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-25382) Super Split Meta

2023-09-13 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17764770#comment-17764770 ] ruanhui edited comment on HBASE-25382 at 9/13/23 4:16 PM: -- Hi all In our

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-25382) Super Split Meta

2023-09-13 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17764770#comment-17764770 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-25382: - Hi all In our production environment, there are many large-scale

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-28080) correct span name in AbstractRpcBasedConnectionRegistry#getActiveMaster

2023-09-12 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-28080: --- Summary: correct span name in AbstractRpcBasedConnectionRegistry#getActiveMaster Key: HBASE-28080 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28080 Project: HBase

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-26867) Introduce a FlushProcedure

2023-08-27 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ruanhui updated HBASE-26867: Release Note: Introduce a flush procedure to flush tables. The flush procedure is used to perform

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-26867) Introduce a FlushProcedure

2023-08-27 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17759444#comment-17759444 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-26867: - Release note has been filled. Thanks Duo for reviewing and helping !

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-28015) rpc read handler can get stuck on LruBlockCache#getBlock

2023-08-25 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ruanhui updated HBASE-28015: Description: In our production, we found lots of read handlers got stuck on LruBlockCache#getBlock. This

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-26867) Introduce a FlushProcedure

2023-08-16 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17755151#comment-17755151 ] ruanhui edited comment on HBASE-26867 at 8/17/23 2:37 AM: -- The patch for

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-26867) Introduce a FlushProcedure

2023-08-16 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17755151#comment-17755151 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-26867: - The patch for branch has been submited.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-26867) Introduce a FlushProcedure

2023-08-14 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17754111#comment-17754111 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-26867: - Thanks [~zhangduo] for helping and reviewing ! I'll upload the patch

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-28015) rpc read handler can get stuck on LruBlockCache#getBlock

2023-08-10 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ruanhui updated HBASE-28015: Summary: rpc read handler can get stuck on LruBlockCache#getBlock (was: rpc handler can get stuck on

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-28015) rpc handler can get stuck on LruBlockCache

2023-08-10 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ruanhui updated HBASE-28015: Description: In our production, we found lots of read handlers got stuck on LruBlockCache#getBlock. This

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-28015) rpc handler can get stuck on LruBlockCache

2023-08-10 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-28015: --- Summary: rpc handler can get stuck on LruBlockCache Key: HBASE-28015 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28015 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27988) NPE in AddPeerProcedure recovery

2023-07-24 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17746491#comment-17746491 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27988: - The PR is ready. PTAL. [~zhangduo]  Thanks. > NPE in

[jira] (HBASE-27214) Implement the new replication hfile/log cleaner

2023-07-23 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27214 ] ruanhui deleted comment on HBASE-27214: - was (Author: frostruan): Would there also be race condition between AddPeerProcedure and  ReplicationHFileCleaner ? because from my understanding, the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27214) Implement the new replication hfile/log cleaner

2023-07-23 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17746113#comment-17746113 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27214: - Would there also be race condition between AddPeerProcedure and 

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-27988) NPE in AddPeerProcedure recovery

2023-07-23 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-27988: --- Summary: NPE in AddPeerProcedure recovery Key: HBASE-27988 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27988 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug Components:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27984) NPE in MigrateReplicationQueueFromZkToTableProcedure recovery

2023-07-22 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17746009#comment-17746009 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27984: - ok. Let me try. Thanks Duo [~zhangduo]  > NPE in

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27984) NPE in MigrateReplicationQueueFromZkToTableProcedure recovery

2023-07-22 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17745982#comment-17745982 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27984: - Thanks [~zhangduo] for the fixing.   It looks like AddPeerProcedure

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-27984) NPE in MigrateReplicationQueueFromZkToTableProcedure recovery

2023-07-19 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-27984: --- Summary: NPE in MigrateReplicationQueueFromZkToTableProcedure recovery Key: HBASE-27984 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27984 Project: HBase Issue

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-27968) add JvmPauseMonitor in hbase-client

2023-07-09 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-27968: --- Summary: add JvmPauseMonitor in hbase-client Key: HBASE-27968 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27968 Project: HBase Issue Type: New Feature

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-27967) introduce a ConnectionLimitHandler to limit the number of concurrent connections to the Server

2023-07-07 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-27967: --- Summary: introduce a ConnectionLimitHandler to limit the number of concurrent connections to the Server Key: HBASE-27967 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27967

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27905) Directly schedule procedures that do not need to acquire locks

2023-06-08 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17730630#comment-17730630 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27905: - sorry for the mistake . Permission settings have been updated.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27855) Support dynamic adjustment of flusher count

2023-06-06 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17729911#comment-17729911 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27855: - Thanks Duo for reviewing [~zhangduo]  > Support dynamic adjustment

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-27855) Support dynamic adjustment of flusher count

2023-06-06 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ruanhui updated HBASE-27855: Release Note: Support dynamic adjustment of flusher count > Support dynamic adjustment of flusher count >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27905) Directly schedule procedures that do not need to acquire locks

2023-06-04 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17729068#comment-17729068 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27905: - hi duo [~zhangduo]  I posted a document and listed the problems I

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27905) Directly schedule procedures that do not need to acquire locks

2023-06-03 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17728984#comment-17728984 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27905: - Okay, I will post a document as soon as possible to explain the

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-27905) Directly schedule procedures that do not need to acquire locks

2023-06-03 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-27905: --- Summary: Directly schedule procedures that do not need to acquire locks Key: HBASE-27905 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27905 Project: HBase Issue

[jira] (HBASE-27890) Expose a getter on Connection/AsyncConnection for getting public access to connection metrics

2023-05-27 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27890 ] ruanhui deleted comment on HBASE-27890: - was (Author: frostruan): Great idea ! This will greatly simplify monitoring of clients. > Expose a getter on Connection/AsyncConnection for getting

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27885) expose metaCacheHits in MetricsConnection

2023-05-25 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17726481#comment-17726481 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27885: - If you don't mind, I'd like to help to make this forward a bit. >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27890) Expose a getter on Connection/AsyncConnection for getting public access to connection metrics

2023-05-25 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17726458#comment-17726458 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27890: - Great idea ! This will greatly simplify monitoring of clients. >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27885) expose metaCacheHits in MetricsConnection

2023-05-25 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17726222#comment-17726222 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27885: - Our internal version is based on branch-2.4. In the branch-2.4, there

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27885) expose metaCacheHits in MetricsConnection

2023-05-24 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17726019#comment-17726019 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27885: - We are troubleshooting a problem with an abnormally high amount of

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27885) expose metaCacheHits in MetricsConnection

2023-05-24 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17725868#comment-17725868 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27885: - Thanks for the comments.   Yes, but currently we can only get its

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-27885) expose metaCacheHits in MetricsConnection

2023-05-24 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-27885: --- Summary: expose metaCacheHits in MetricsConnection Key: HBASE-27885 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27885 Project: HBase Issue Type: New Feature

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-27855) Support dynamic adjustment of flusher count

2023-05-10 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-27855: --- Summary: Support dynamic adjustment of flusher count Key: HBASE-27855 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27855 Project: HBase Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27844) changed type names to avoid conflicts with built-in types

2023-05-08 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17720512#comment-17720512 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27844: - already done. Thanks Duo. > changed type names to avoid conflicts

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27844) changed type names to avoid conflicts with built-in types

2023-05-05 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17719693#comment-17719693 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27844: - Thanks for the comment Duo. I'm having this problem on my mac m1, my

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-27844) changed type names to avoid conflicts with built-in types

2023-05-04 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-27844: --- Summary: changed type names to avoid conflicts with built-in types Key: HBASE-27844 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27844 Project: HBase Issue Type:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27458) Use ReadWriteLock for region scanner readpoint map

2023-03-01 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17695109#comment-17695109 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27458: - hi [~Xiaolin Ha]  here is the PR for branch-2.4  

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27458) Use ReadWriteLock for region scanner readpoint map

2023-02-14 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17688814#comment-17688814 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27458: - [~Xiaolin Ha]  sorry a little busy recently. will start this work

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27458) Use ReadWriteLock for region scanner readpoint map

2022-12-06 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17644109#comment-17644109 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27458: - Can't think of a reason why we can't do this. :D > Use ReadWriteLock

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-27463) Reset sizeOfLogQueue when refresh replication source

2022-11-03 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-27463: --- Summary: Reset sizeOfLogQueue when refresh replication source Key: HBASE-27463 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27463 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-27458) Use ReadWriteLock for region scanner readpoint map

2022-11-01 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-27458: --- Summary: Use ReadWriteLock for region scanner readpoint map Key: HBASE-27458 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27458 Project: HBase Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-27445) result of DirectMemoryUtils#getDirectMemorySize may be wrong

2022-10-25 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-27445: --- Summary: result of DirectMemoryUtils#getDirectMemorySize may be wrong Key: HBASE-27445 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27445 Project: HBase Issue

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27355) Separate meta read requests from master and client

2022-10-25 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17624182#comment-17624182 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27355: - Ok. Thanks for the reply Duo. will submit the patch soon.[~zhangduo] 

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27414) Search order for locations in HFileLink

2022-10-18 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17619679#comment-17619679 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27414: - hi [~huaxiangsun]  would you mind if I prepare a patch for this ? >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27355) Separate meta read requests from master and client

2022-10-09 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17614716#comment-17614716 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27355: - Hi Duo Do you think we can use an additional RpcExecutor to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27355) Separate meta read requests from master and client

2022-09-27 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17610003#comment-17610003 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27355: - Oh, got it. How about we first solving the problem of setting

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27355) Separate meta read requests from master and client

2022-09-27 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17609826#comment-17609826 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27355: - Thanks for your comment Duo. My original purpose was to solve the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27355) Separate meta read requests from master and client

2022-09-24 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17609024#comment-17609024 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27355: - hi Duo  I tried to check whether the source of the request is from

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27304) Support using IP to expose master/rs servers for some special scenarios

2022-09-07 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17601598#comment-17601598 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27304: - Nice feature! We encountered the same problem when deploying HBase

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27355) Separate meta read requests from master and client

2022-09-05 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17600347#comment-17600347 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27355: - {quote} So the solution here is to have a special handler group for

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27320) hide some sensitive configuration information in the UI

2022-09-02 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17599561#comment-17599561 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27320: - Thanks for the comment [~ndimiduk] . Luckily most of our users are

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-27355) Separate meta read requests from master and client

2022-09-02 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ruanhui updated HBASE-27355: External issue URL: (was: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26415) > Separate meta read

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-27355) Separate meta read requests from master and client

2022-09-02 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-27355: --- Summary: Separate meta read requests from master and client Key: HBASE-27355 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27355 Project: HBase Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-27325) the bulkload max call queue size can be update to a wrong value

2022-08-24 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-27325: --- Summary: the bulkload max call queue size can be update to a wrong value Key: HBASE-27325 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27325 Project: HBase Issue

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-27320) hide some sensitive configuration information in the UI

2022-08-24 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ruanhui updated HBASE-27320: Release Note: hide superuser and password related settings in the configuration UI > hide some sensitive

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27320) hide some sensitive configuration information in the UI

2022-08-24 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17584088#comment-17584088 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27320: - ok. Thanks for reviewing [~zhangduo] [~taklwu] . > hide some

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-27320) hide some sensitive configuration information in the UI

2022-08-23 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-27320: --- Summary: hide some sensitive configuration information in the UI Key: HBASE-27320 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27320 Project: HBase Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-27305) add an option to skip file splitting when bulkload hfiles

2022-08-16 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-27305: --- Summary: add an option to skip file splitting when bulkload hfiles Key: HBASE-27305 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27305 Project: HBase Issue Type:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27157) Potential race condition in WorkerAssigner

2022-07-07 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563587#comment-17563587 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27157: - Thank you for your pointers Duo.Let me fix this problem. > Potential

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27157) Potential race condition in WorkerAssigner

2022-07-06 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17563010#comment-17563010 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-27157: - OK. I'll start this work ASAP. Thanks for your help Duo. > Potential

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-27157) Potential race condition in WorkerAssigner

2022-06-24 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ruanhui reassigned HBASE-27157: --- Assignee: ruanhui > Potential race condition in WorkerAssigner >

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-27158) Add namespace column family to UNDELETABLE_META_COLUMNFAMILIES

2022-06-24 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ruanhui reassigned HBASE-27158: --- Assignee: ruanhui > Add namespace column family to UNDELETABLE_META_COLUMNFAMILIES >

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-27158) Add namespace column family to UNDELETABLE_META_COLUMNFAMILIES

2022-06-24 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-27158: --- Summary: Add namespace column family to UNDELETABLE_META_COLUMNFAMILIES Key: HBASE-27158 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27158 Project: HBase Issue

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-27157) Potential race condition in WorkerAssigner

2022-06-23 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
ruanhui created HBASE-27157: --- Summary: Potential race condition in WorkerAssigner Key: HBASE-27157 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27157 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-24408) Introduce a general 'local region' to store data on master

2022-05-05 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17532612#comment-17532612 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-24408: - I think we can store all data only accessible by master in the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-24408) Introduce a general 'local region' to store data on master

2022-05-05 Thread ruanhui (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17532450#comment-17532450 ] ruanhui commented on HBASE-24408: - And I think the rsgroup info can also be stored in the

  1   2   >