[GitHub] [hbase] timoha commented on pull request #1826: HBASE-24438 Don't update TaskMonitor when deserializing ServerCrashProcedure

2020-09-09 Thread GitBox
timoha commented on pull request #1826: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/1826#issuecomment-689901122 yup, the approach wasn't suitable enough to address the issue and I wasn't planning to improve it further, so I'll leave it to be properly addressed by hbase team 

[GitHub] [hbase] timoha commented on pull request #1826: HBASE-24438 Don't update TaskMonitor when deserializing ServerCrashProcedure

2020-07-06 Thread GitBox
timoha commented on pull request #1826: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/1826#issuecomment-654381936 Looks like operator intervention is needed for this issue :) > I for one do not look at TaskMonitor figuring state of Procedures. Do others? Thanks. Just from my

[GitHub] [hbase] timoha commented on pull request #1826: HBASE-24438 Don't update TaskMonitor when deserializing ServerCrashProcedure

2020-06-04 Thread GitBox
timoha commented on pull request #1826: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/1826#issuecomment-639009293 I'll let others also comment before submitting a patch. I personally prefer for de-serialize to not have side effects all the way to what shows in the UI and also like removing

[GitHub] [hbase] timoha commented on pull request #1826: HBASE-24438 Don't update TaskMonitor when deserializing ServerCrashProcedure

2020-06-03 Thread GitBox
timoha commented on pull request #1826: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/1826#issuecomment-638533674 That's a good point @Apache9, I guess it would add sort of "continuity" to show that the task is still ongoing during master failover in case the procedure hasn't actually

[GitHub] [hbase] timoha commented on pull request #1826: HBASE-24438 Don't update TaskMonitor when deserializing ServerCrashProcedure

2020-06-02 Thread GitBox
timoha commented on pull request #1826: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/1826#issuecomment-637745870 Thanks for suggestion @Apache9, but I don't think that's going to work for the case of state being `SERVER_CRASH_FINISH`. With such code change, `executeFromState` will end up