Re: [PR] HBASE-28502 Cleanup old backup manifest logic [hbase]

2024-05-15 Thread via GitHub
ndimiduk commented on PR #5871: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5871#issuecomment-2112749361 Merged to master. I'll start backporting and holler if I have any issues. Thanks for the contribution @DieterDP-ng and for the review @rmdmattingly ! -- This is an automated message

Re: [PR] HBASE-28502 Cleanup old backup manifest logic [hbase]

2024-05-15 Thread via GitHub
ndimiduk merged PR #5871: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5871 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [PR] HBASE-28502 Cleanup old backup manifest logic [hbase]

2024-05-13 Thread via GitHub
joshelser commented on PR #5871: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5871#issuecomment-2108176794  sorry, I don't recall exactly what was being put into the incremental backups anymore. I remember holding on to all of the WAL files quickly got out of control and we talked about

Re: [PR] HBASE-28502 Cleanup old backup manifest logic [hbase]

2024-05-13 Thread via GitHub
DieterDP-ng commented on code in PR #5871: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5871#discussion_r1598573660 ## hbase-backup/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/backup/HBackupFileSystem.java: ## @@ -102,24 +95,6 @@ public static Path getTableBackupPath(TableName

Re: [PR] HBASE-28502 Cleanup old backup manifest logic [hbase]

2024-05-13 Thread via GitHub
DieterDP-ng commented on PR #5871: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5871#issuecomment-2107727003 > Looks good to me. It would be good to solicit comments from whomever made the change that deprecated the old manifest logic in the first place. @DieterDP-ng do you know whom that

Re: [PR] HBASE-28502 Cleanup old backup manifest logic [hbase]

2024-05-10 Thread via GitHub
ndimiduk commented on PR #5871: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5871#issuecomment-2104294247 Looks like both modified test methods were executed and passed. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use

Re: [PR] HBASE-28502 Cleanup old backup manifest logic [hbase]

2024-05-10 Thread via GitHub
ndimiduk commented on code in PR #5871: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5871#discussion_r1596521351 ## hbase-backup/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/backup/HBackupFileSystem.java: ## @@ -102,24 +95,6 @@ public static Path getTableBackupPath(TableName tableName,

Re: [PR] HBASE-28502 Cleanup old backup manifest logic [hbase]

2024-05-03 Thread via GitHub
Apache-HBase commented on PR #5871: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5871#issuecomment-2093661849 :confetti_ball: **+1 overall** | Vote | Subsystem | Runtime | Comment | |::|--:|:|:| | +0 :ok: | reexec | 0m 45s |

Re: [PR] HBASE-28502 Cleanup old backup manifest logic [hbase]

2024-05-03 Thread via GitHub
Apache-HBase commented on PR #5871: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5871#issuecomment-2093651831 :confetti_ball: **+1 overall** | Vote | Subsystem | Runtime | Comment | |::|--:|:|:| | +0 :ok: | reexec | 0m 28s |

Re: [PR] HBASE-28502 Cleanup old backup manifest logic [hbase]

2024-05-03 Thread via GitHub
Apache-HBase commented on PR #5871: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5871#issuecomment-2093650993 :confetti_ball: **+1 overall** | Vote | Subsystem | Runtime | Comment | |::|--:|:|:| | +0 :ok: | reexec | 0m 36s |

Re: [PR] HBASE-28502 Cleanup old backup manifest logic [hbase]

2024-05-03 Thread via GitHub
Apache-HBase commented on PR #5871: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5871#issuecomment-2093642616 :confetti_ball: **+1 overall** | Vote | Subsystem | Runtime | Comment | |::|--:|:|:| | +0 :ok: | reexec | 0m 25s |

[PR] HBASE-28502 Cleanup old backup manifest logic [hbase]

2024-05-03 Thread via GitHub
DieterDP-ng opened a new pull request, #5871: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5871 In older versions of HBase's backup mechanism, a manifest was written per table being backed up. This was since refactored to one manifest per backup, but the manifest code was not updated. A